wording consideration about deletion/removal/moving

[ccoVeille]

We raised a point in a PR about adding shell completion

#440 (comment)

The current wording in the code (mostly in the --help) and README file and now the completion refers to

Usage: rmw [OPTION]... FILE...
Move FILE(s) to a WASTE directory listed in configuration file

(...)

Restore FILE(s) from a WASTE directory

(...)
  -l, --list                list waste directories
      --empty               completely empty (purge) all waste directories
(...)
  -z, --restore FILE(s)     restore FILE(s) (see man page example)
  -s, --select              select files from list to restore
  -u, --undo-last           undo last move
  -m, --most-recent-list    list most recently rmw'ed files

Here the wording is about moving files, waste directory, and "rmw'ed" files

The repository description is about

trashcan/recycle bin utility for the command line 

The name of the tool is about

rmw (ReMove to Waste)

I feel like someone reading the --help at first, like I did a few days ago is lost with the context

I'm unsure what should be the wording, but I think it would be better to use the same word/expression everywhere, something like:

• trashed: quite neutral
• wasted: accurate, but connoted
• moved: accurate because it's what the code does. It moves code to waste directory, but it sounds strange to me.
• rmw'ed: difficult to understand

I only listed the word/ideas already used in the tool. Something better may emerge.

I'm curious about your thoughts guys