-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement target metadata API #3870
Comments
@yeya24 I'd love to take up this issue |
Feel free to take it! |
Hello 👋 Looks like there was no activity on this issue for the last two months. |
Closing for now as promised, let us know if you need this to be reopened! 🤗 |
@crsandeep I will take a go at this unless you are still working on it in the background? |
Apologies, I couldn't get to this. |
Chatted with @philipgough about this ticket earlier, we were a little confused so just wanted to be more explicit about what we expect the output of a call to Query's Say we had a Querier configured to communicate with two sidecars Example Prometheus target metadata response
We assume that the expected output of calling Query's This behaviour would be consistent with the handling of metadata in the TestMetadataAPI_Fanout integration test. Is that in-line with what you had in mind @yeya24 ? |
I was looking into using the |
Hello 👋 Looks like there was no activity on this issue for the last two months. |
Closing for now as promised, let us know if you need this to be reopened! 🤗 |
Any news around that ? @philipgough @ianbillett I saw your closed PRs... :/ Maybe we should reopen they ? |
As metric metadata API was merged #3686, it would be good to also support the Prometheus target metadata API (https://prometheus.io/docs/prometheus/latest/querying/api/#querying-target-metadata).
As the API response format is very similar to the previous metric metadata API, it would be not so difficult to support it. We can reuse the existing proto file as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: