Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Purpose/why for preemptible_and_regular_instance_templates module #101

Open
mafrosis opened this issue Jul 7, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Purpose/why for preemptible_and_regular_instance_templates module #101

mafrosis opened this issue Jul 7, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
docs enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers P4 low priority issues triaged Scoped and ready for work

Comments

@mafrosis
Copy link

mafrosis commented Jul 7, 2020

A five minute click around and read of the docs suggests that preemptible_and_regular_instance_templates module exists because the normal instance_template module can be only preemptible or regular, but not both.

Is this correct? I would suggest it's worth adding "why would I use this" to all the modules README very close to the top 😄

@morgante
Copy link
Contributor

morgante commented Jul 8, 2020

Yes, the idea is to be able to have a workload defined once but deployed using a mix of preemptible and regular VMs.

Agreed that we can add more value/usage info to the README. Happy to accept a PR.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Feb 12, 2021
@morgante morgante added docs enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers P4 low priority issues triaged Scoped and ready for work and removed Stale labels Feb 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers P4 low priority issues triaged Scoped and ready for work
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants