Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maintainers Wanted! #43

Open
teobais opened this issue Jun 17, 2017 · 10 comments
Open

Maintainers Wanted! #43

teobais opened this issue Jun 17, 2017 · 10 comments

Comments

@teobais
Copy link
Owner

teobais commented Jun 17, 2017

Hello all,

I've lately seen a few new user requirements coming up for percircle, which I would also appreciate as a user, if they have been in place.

However, I've lately been busy with other personal projects, etc., which led me to the conclusion that I cannot maintain it anymore.

If there's anyone interested in taking percircle to the next step, they could just share their thoughts in this thread :bowtie:.

Maintenance is defined as anything loyal to the scope of the project (i.e. investigation of issues opened from the users, further development of percircle, investigation for migration/porting to latest technologies, as react, etc.).

Cheers,
TB

@teobais
Copy link
Owner Author

teobais commented Sep 7, 2017

@shyamshingadiya sorry, I just noticed this reference. Was it intentional or not?
Because I do not see any actual connection between the issue itself and your commit's message.

Cheers!

@shyamshingadiya
Copy link

I change few lines in existing code due to one issue in Stackoverflow. Please check below link for the issue and resolution.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44752874/percircle-wont-update-percentage

@teobais
Copy link
Owner Author

teobais commented Jan 28, 2018

Since nobody is volunteering, I'll try to support new issues 🔢

@teobais teobais closed this as completed Jan 28, 2018
@krisrajz
Copy link

Is it possible that I can select a value? such as percentage complete??

@teobais
Copy link
Owner Author

teobais commented Jun 25, 2018

Hi @krisrajz ,

thanks for using percircle.

Could you please be more specific?

Regards,
TB

@ptcmariano
Copy link

Hello TB.

Transparency is all. Thanks for support.

The others contribuitors, can help?

@chrisahardie | @chris--jones | @tinglu | @tranthanhhoa | @ahmadajmi | @Sylphony | @yireo

regards.

PT

@teobais
Copy link
Owner Author

teobais commented Aug 28, 2018

Hey @ptcmariano ,

thank you for your interest in percircle!

Do you have any specific query I could help you with?

Reopening so that is clear we are still in the search of maintainers.

Regards,
TB

@teobais teobais reopened this Aug 28, 2018
@shyamshingadiya
Copy link

Hey @thodorisbais,

Can you please elaborate on the issue, I would like to work on the same because I am already using this in one of my project.

Regards,
Shyam Shingadiya

@ptcmariano
Copy link

Hey TB,
I am using this in one of my project.
That's why I commented.
Regards,
PT

@teobais
Copy link
Owner Author

teobais commented Aug 29, 2018

Hey people,

I've just reopened/created a few issues, so:

  1. @ptcmariano if you feel there is more stuff/features needed to best serve your needs, feel free to create a new issue so that we could discuss it
  2. @shyamshingadiya there is no specific issue in this thread, we would just like to improve percircle and for this reason I reopened the current thread, since we need the help of the community 😃 . Thus, if you are interested, you could contribute in any of the currently opened issues or if you indeed think it takes much of your (work) time at the moment to customize it for your work, you could even become a maintainer and discuss together more about the future of this project!

For now, the very first priorities are #35 and #54 , so, if anybody's interested, please leave a comment to the corresponding issue, so that you could start working on it.

Regards,
TB

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants