Expense example #201
Open
Expense example #201
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cretz
approved these changes
Jun 23, 2025
| f"{EXPENSE_SERVER_HOST_PORT}/create", | ||
| params={"is_api_call": "true", "id": expense_id}, | ||
| ) | ||
| response.raise_for_status() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Technically 4xx is probably a ApplicationError with non_retryable=True, but that's a bit pedantic. But with this setup, an activity that, say, has invalid auth will retry forever
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was changed
Ported the expense example from Go to Python
Why?
Demonstrate human-in-the-loop processing and asynchronous activity completion
Checklist
Closes N/A
How was this tested:
Includes tests
Any docs updates needed?
README is updated