Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support SLSA 1.0 provenance storage #889

Open
3 of 6 tasks
chitrangpatel opened this issue Aug 1, 2023 · 5 comments
Open
3 of 6 tasks

Support SLSA 1.0 provenance storage #889

chitrangpatel opened this issue Aug 1, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/stale

Comments

@chitrangpatel
Copy link
Contributor

chitrangpatel commented Aug 1, 2023

The formatting for slsa v1.0 provenance was added in Chains Release 0.17.0. However, before declaring that Chains now produces SLSA v1.0 provenance, we need to add support for storage.

This issue highlights all the storage options we need to add support for:

/kind feature

@chitrangpatel chitrangpatel added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Aug 1, 2023
@tekton-robot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale with a justification.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close with a justification.
If this issue should be exempted, mark the issue as frozen with /lifecycle frozen with a justification.

/lifecycle stale

Send feedback to tektoncd/plumbing.

@annelled
Copy link

Hi @chitrangpatel I would like to follow up on the status of this ticket since it has been marked as stale.

Has support for storage for OCI been added? I see that the documentation states that "Tekton Chains supports both SLSA v0.2 and v1.0 provenance for both task-level and pipeline-level provenance."

@chitrangpatel
Copy link
Contributor Author

A lot of these should apply as is to the new provenance type as well. We haven't verified that though. I
t might be worth trying if storing the provenance in OCI works out of the box.

@annelled
Copy link

@chitrangpatel thank you for your response. I can confirm that we were able to store attestations as OCI (GCR) in the SLSA v1.0 format.

@chitrangpatel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for reporting that! I've checked that off the list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants