Techsenger MVVM4FX is a tiny framework for developing JavaFX applications using the MVVM pattern. It provides all the necessary interfaces and base class implementations for creating components, which serve as the units of the MVVM pattern. Examples of components include tabs, dialog windows, toolbars, image viewers, help pages, and more.
As a real example of using this framework, see TabShell project.
- Overview
- Features
- MVVM
- Component
- Requirements
- Dependencies
- Code building
- Running Demo
- License
- Contributing
- Support Us
MVVM4FX reimagines the Model–View–ViewModel pattern for JavaFX as a component-based, extensible platform designed
around clarity, modularity, and the KISS principle. Each component exists as a self-contained unit composed of a View,
ViewModel and Descriptor, optionally extended with Composer and History.
The framework enforces a strict separation between presentation, logic, and identity. The View defines the visual
structure and behavior; the ViewModel encapsulates logic and state; the Descriptor holds the component’s technical
identity; the Composer is responsible for managing child components and their composition; and the
History preserves continuity across sessions.
At its core, MVVM4FX follows the KISS principle – every class, method, and abstraction exists only for a clear reason, avoiding unnecessary complexity or dependencies. This simplicity is deliberate: it keeps the architecture transparent, predictable, and easy to extend.
By combining conceptual clarity with structural discipline, MVVM4FX achieves both architectural purity and practical flexibility — a balance where components remain independent yet fully interoperable. It is not a minimalistic abstraction but a complete design system for building coherent, maintainable, and intelligent JavaFX applications.
Key features include:
- Support for the component lifecycle.
- Organization of core tasks within the view.
- Component inheritance.
- Ability to preserve component history.
- Designed without considering FXML support.
- Support for component-level logging.
- Detailed documentation and sample code.
MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel) is an architectural pattern that divides an application's logic into three main parts:
Model, View, and ViewModel.
Model — encapsulates the data and business logic of the application. Models represent an abstraction that stores and
processes the application’s data, including all business logic rules and data validation logic. Models do not interact
with the UI and do not know about View or ViewModel. Instead, they provide data and perform actions related to the
business logic. Model can include:
- Data (for example, entities from a database or objects obtained from external sources).
- Business logic (such as data processing rules, calculations, data manipulation).
- Validation logic (for example, checks that are performed before saving data).
View — represents the user interface that displays the data. The View's task is to contain UI elements and bind their
state to the ViewModel. View is responsible for displaying data and interacting with the user, but it should not
contain logic for managing the state of these elements. Because it is the responsibility of the ViewModel to control
this state without knowing about specific controls in the View. For example, if the ViewModel indicates that a button
should be active or inactive, the View will update the control, but the View will not manage the logic that determines
when the button should be enabled or disabled.
Besides, the View may and should contain logic related to the visual behavior and layout of elements (presentation
logic). This includes calculating positions and sizes, managing component arrangement (e.g., docking or resizing),
handling animations, drag-and-drop operations, or other view-related interactions that depend on specific UI components.
ViewModel — manages the state of UI elements without needing to know the implementation details of the user interface.
ViewModel can also serve as a layer between the View and Model, obtaining data from the Model and preparing it for
display in the View. It can transform the data from the model into a format suitable for UI presentation.
-
Separation of concerns. MVVM helps to clearly separate the presentation logic (
View), business logic and data (Model), and interaction logic (ViewModel). This simplifies code maintenance and makes it more readable. -
Testability. The
ViewModelcan be tested independently of the user interface (UI) because it is not tied to specific visual elements. This makes it easy to write unit tests for business logic. -
Two-way data binding. In MVVM, data is automatically synchronized between the
ViewandViewModel, which reduces the amount of code required for managing UI state and simplifies updates. -
Simplification of complex UIs. When an application has complex UIs with dynamic data, MVVM helps make the code more understandable and structured, easing management of UI element states.
-
UI updates without direct manipulation. The
ViewModelmanages updates to theViewvia data binding, avoiding direct manipulation of UI elements. This makes the code more flexible and scalable.
A component is a fundamental, self-contained building block of a user interface (UI) that provides a specific piece of functionality and enables user interaction. A component represents a higher-level abstraction than standard UI controls, fundamentally distinguished by its compositional nature, which encompasses and organizes multiple UI controls, its managed lifecycle, and its capacity to maintain state history. Crucially, while usually components also encapsulate business logic, this is not a mandatory trait for all, as structural components like layout containers demonstrate.
A component always consists of at least two classes: a ComponentViewModel and a ComponentView. A natural question
might arise: why is there no Model in the component, given that the pattern is called MVVM? Firstly, a component
is a building block for constructing a user interface, which might not be related to the application's business logic
at all. Secondly, the Model exists independently of the UI and should have no knowledge of the component's existence.
Thirdly, MVVM is fundamentally about the separation of responsibilities rather than the mandatory presence of all
three layers in every element. In other words, a component does not violate MVVM principles simply because it lacks a
Model; it remains compliant as long as the View and ViewModel maintain a clear separation of concerns and
communicate exclusively through data binding and observable properties.
In addition to the ComponentViewModel and ComponentView, a component always has a ComponentDescriptor (which
is provided by the framework and normally does not require custom implementation) and may include two optional
classes: ComponentHistory and ComponentComposer.
The ComponentDescriptor represents the internal metadata and platform-level state of a component. The descriptor
acts as a technical identity card, containing all framework-related information while keeping it completely separate
from business data. In other words, the purpose of this class is to ensure that internal component data does not mix
with business data within the ViewModel.
The ComponentHistory enables the preservation of the component’s state across its lifecycle. Data exchange occurs
exclusively between the ComponentViewModel and the ComponentHistory. When the component’s state transitions to
INITIALIZING, data is restored from the ComponentHistory to the ComponentViewModel. Conversely, when the state
transitions to DEINITIALIZED, data from the ComponentViewModel is saved back to the ComponentHistory. The volume
of state information that is restored and persisted is defined by the HistoryPolicy enum.
The ComponentComposer is responsible for managing child components and their composition
(see Composite Component).
A component has five distinct states (see ComponentState):
| State | Description |
|---|---|
| Creating | The component is currently being created. During this phase, both the ComponentViewModel and the ComponentView objects are being constructed, but initialization has not yet started. |
| Initializing | The component is in the process of initialization. This phase begins when the ComponentView#initialize() method is invoked, during which bindings, listeners, and other setup logic are established. When the component transitions to this state, the ComponentViewModel restores its state from the ComponentHistory. |
| Initialized | The component has been fully initialized and is ready for use. It enters this state upon completion of the ComponentView#initialize() method, but before the call to the AbstractComponentView#postInitialize() method. |
| Deinitializing | The component is in the process of deinitialization. This phase begins when the ComponentView#deinitialize() method is invoked, during which bindings are removed, listeners are detached, and cleanup logic is performed. |
| Deinitialized | The component has been completely deinitialized and can no longer be used. It enters this state upon completion of the ComponentView#deinitialize() method, but before the call to the AbstractComponentView#postDeinitialize() method. When the component transitions to this state, the ComponentViewModel saves its state to the ComponentHistory. |
Each component features ComponentView#initialize() and ComponentView#deinitialize() methods, which initialize and
deinitialize the component, respectively, altering its state. The default implementation of these methods in
AbstractComponentView is achieved through template methods that handle component building/unbuilding, binding/unbinding,
adding/removing listeners, and adding/removing handlers via corresponding protected methods. It is important to note
that these protected methods should not be considered the exclusive location for performing such tasks (e.g.,
adding/removing handlers) within the component, but rather as part of the initialization/deinitialization process.
Thus, adding/removing handlers may also be performed in other methods of the component.
Components can act as both parents and children, forming a tree structure that can change dynamically. The library provides a mechanism for dynamically creating and removing components and includes optional logic for managing component relationships, leaving their use to the developer's discretion.
The component tree is built according to the Unidirectional Hierarchy Rule (UHR). This rule establishes a strict hierarchical order by explicitly prohibiting circular parent-child relationships, meaning a component cannot simultaneously be a direct parent and a direct child of another component. The UHR is designed to maintain a clear, acyclic structure, which prevents logical conflicts and ensures predictable behavior. Importantly, this rule does not restrict child components from directly accessing or communicating with their parents; it solely forbids cyclical dependencies that would compromise the architectural integrity of the hierarchy.
It is crucial to highlight the interaction between components. Consider a parent and a child component as an example.
The parent component's ComponentViewModel holds a reference to the child component's ComponentViewModel via its
children field, while the child component's ComponentViewModel holds a reference to the parent component's
ComponentViewModel via its parent field. Similarly, the parent component's ComponentView holds a reference to the
child component's ComponentView through its children field, and the child component's ComponentView holds a
reference to the parent component's ComponentView via its parent field.
This two-layer linkage establishes a coherent and symmetric relationship between parent and child components at both
the View and ViewModel layers. The parent and child components are fully aware of each other's existence and state,
enabling direct coordination and communication within the hierarchy while maintaining clear separation of concerns
between the presentation (View) and logic (ViewModel) layers. This design ensures consistency and synchronization
across the component tree without violating the Unidirectional Hierarchy Rule (UHR), as the relationships are strictly
hierarchical and non-cyclic.
Components can be either simple or composite. A simple component has no child components. A composite component has one or more child components. Working with a composite component is one of the most challenging parts of using the platform for the following reasons:
- MVVM Gap. MVVM does not specify how child components should be created, how their lifecycle should be managed, or how they should be composed.
- Architectural Conflict. According to MVVM, the
ViewModelmust not know about theView, yet theViewModelmay need to initiate the creation of new components (for example, opening a dialog) and their composition — which is impossible without interacting with theView. - Implementation Complexity. Due to the two-layer structure of a component (
ViewandViewModel), each of them requires its own version of a composer, which doubles the complexity of the problem. In addition, naming becomes difficult, since names likeSomeComponentViewComposerandSomeComponentViewModelComposerare hardly convenient to work with. - Inheritance Challenges. Supporting component inheritance, where hierarchies of all classes of inherited components
must be created:
ChildViewextendsParentView,ChildViewModelextendsParentViewModel,ChildComposerextendsParentComposeretc.
In MVVM4FX, the solution for working with composite components is implemented as follows.
- Separate Composer Interfaces. In the
ViewandViewModelclasses of a composite component, nestedComposerinterfaces are defined:View.Composercontains the methods that theViewwill use to work with theComposer, andViewModel.Composercontains the methods that theViewModelwill use to work with theComposer. The need to use interfaces is explained, firstly, by the requirement to test the component independently of other components, and secondly, by the fact that theComposermust know about both theViewand theViewModel, which would otherwise violate MVVM principles.
public class FooViewModel extends AbstractChildViewModel {
public interface Composer extends ComponentViewModel.Composer {...}
...
}
public class FooView extends AbstractChildView<FooViewModel> {
public interface Composer extends ComponentView.Composer {...}
...
}- Unified Composer Implementation. A single
Composerclass serves as the main implementation, which directly implements theView.Composerinterface and contains a nested class implementing theViewModel.Composerinterface. The composer holds a reference to the associatedViewinstance, allowing both the main class and nested class to access view-specific functionality while maintaining proper separation of concerns.
public class FooComposer extends AbstractChildComposer<FooView> implements FooView.Composer {
protected class ViewModelComposer
extends AbstractChildComposer.ViewModelComposer
implements FooViewModel.Composer {...}
...
}- Composer Assignment. To assign a
Composerto theViewModel, the public methodAbstractComponentViewModel#setComposer(...)is used, and for theView—AbstractComponentView#setComposer(...). There is also the methodAbstractComponentView#createComposer(), which can be overridden to automateComposercreation during construction.
Advantages of this approach:
- Strict Separation. Using the
View.ComposerandViewModel.Composerinterfaces enforces a clear separation of layers according to MVVM and simplifies testing. - Clean Architecture. The
Composerclass takes over all work related to managing child components, keeping theViewandViewModelfree from logic that does not belong to them. - MVVM Compliance. The
Composerclass is where theViewModel’s ability to initiate the addition or removal of a component is implemented without violating MVVM principles.
- The element has independent testable state or business logic that can exist without a
View. - The element has a distinct lifecycle requiring separate initialization/deinitialization, or can be dynamically added/removed.
- The element is potentially reusable across different contexts (e.g., dialogs, toolbars, multiple editor types).
- Multiple closely related properties form a logical unit - grouping them into a separate component improves maintainability and reduces parent component complexity.
- The element manages structural composition - it contains child components or forms an independent subtree (e.g., containers, tabs, panels).
- State persistence is required - the element needs its own
Historyto save and restore state between sessions.
- The element’s
ViewModelwould contain no meaningful behavior or data - making the component redundant. - The element represents a minor visual part of the interface and does not require its own logic or state.
- The element is simple enough that separating it into its own component would add unnecessary complexity rather than improving clarity.
Java 11+ and JavaFX 19.
The project will be added to the Maven Central repository in a few days.
To build the library use standard Git and Maven commands:
git clone https://github.com/techsenger/mvvm4fx
cd mvvm4fx
mvn clean install
To run the demo execute the following commands in the root of the project:
cd mvvm4fx-demo
mvn javafx:run
Please note, that debugger settings are in mvvm4fx-demo/pom.xml file.
Techsenger MVVM4FX is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0.
We welcome all contributions. You can help by reporting bugs, suggesting improvements, or submitting pull requests with fixes and new features. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out — we’ll be happy to assist you.
You can support our open-source work through GitHub Sponsors. Your contribution helps us maintain projects, develop new features, and provide ongoing improvements. Multiple sponsorship tiers are available, each offering different levels of recognition and benefits.