Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 24, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@jugglinmike
Copy link
Contributor

Previously, the variable named "byteLengthChecked" could contain a
specification label ("empty") or a Number value. Despite this, it was
only used to determine whether a single condition had been satisfied.
Using a complex type to describe a binary state made the algorithm
appear more complicated than it truly is.

Simplify the value in order to more clearly communicate the variable's
effect on the algorithm.

Previously, the variable named "byteLengthChecked" could contain a
specification label ("~empty~") or a Number value. Despite this, it was
only used to determine whether a single condition had been satisfied.
Using a complex type to describe a binary state made the algorithm
appear more complicated than it truly is.

Simplify the value in order to more clearly communicate the variable's
effect on the algorithm.
@jugglinmike
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've suggested an alternative simplification in gh-84.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant