Skip to content

Updated InMemoryBroker #84

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2023
Merged

Updated InMemoryBroker #84

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2023

Conversation

s3rius
Copy link
Member

@s3rius s3rius commented Apr 1, 2023

This PR makes inmemory broker more robust, because now we don't await for tasks to be executed, we execute them in a true async way.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Kirilin <win10@list.ru>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #84 (9284846) into develop (8cac3a6) will increase coverage by 5.68%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop      #84      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    61.94%   67.62%   +5.68%     
===========================================
  Files           37       37              
  Lines          938      942       +4     
===========================================
+ Hits           581      637      +56     
+ Misses         357      305      -52     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
taskiq/brokers/inmemory_broker.py 96.49% <100.00%> (+34.22%) ⬆️

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@booqoffsky
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@s3rius s3rius merged commit e66f3aa into develop Apr 2, 2023
@s3rius s3rius deleted the feature/inmemory-tasks branch April 2, 2023 23:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants