-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Non-convex Nesting #16
Comments
Hi! There is no estimate currently, this heavily depends on the parent project (PrusaSlicer) roadmap. The feature became low priority in the meantime. In fact, I should change the text of the initial readme as it doesn't really reflect the reality anymore. As to the estimate of time to do it, that is very hard to say even if only I was involved, it would certainly take months of work. |
I'd like to bring to your attention that I've finally put the necessary work into libnfporb to make it robust. There are still issues remaining: https://github.com/kallaballa/libnfporb/issues but they are rare and not critical. Also floating-point and arbitrary precision both yield the same result in the tests, though that parity might break with a mix of very small and very large geometries. |
Hi @kallaballa ! I'll surely try out integrating the new version. It will take some time for me to get to it though. |
Maybe I could do it? Could you provide some hints? |
Hi,
In the readme it is mentioned that non-convex nesting will be added to the library. Do you have any estimation of when this is ready, if you are working on it? If you are not planning to work on it, do you have an estimation on what needs to be added to include the non-convex nesting?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: