Skip to content

948920: Need to resolve merge conflict file #674

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Mar 25, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Hariharansg
Copy link
Collaborator

Feature description

Need to resolve merge conflict file

Requirement and specification document.

948920

API Review task

NA

Output screenshots

NA

Feature matrix document

Feature matrix document updated against this feature and committed in this common location .

  • Yes
  • NO
  • NA

Provide the details about the areas or combinations which have been tested against this code changes.

  • Tested against feature matrix.

Feature acceptance criteria (Test-case document)

Draft the test cases in excel and attach it in the MR itself. The automation must be covered based on this positive and worst-case test-cases.

Automation details

Mark 'Is Automated' field as (Yes, Manual, Not Applicable) in corresponding JIRA task once the feature is automated.

  • BUnit, share corresponding MR.
  • E2E or Manual Automation using tester - Make sure all items are automated with priority before release which can be tracked in automation dashboard.

Test bed sample location

NA

Feature completion checklist

UX changes got approval if UI is added or modified?

  • Yes
  • NO
  • NA

Drafted UG for this feature?

  • Yes
  • NO
  • NA

Content team reviewed the UI content changes.

  • Yes
  • NO
  • NA

Is this the common feature which needs to be addressed in the same component or on other components in our platform?

  • Yes
  • NO

Is there any existing behavior change due to this code change?

  • Yes
  • NO

Blazor Checklist

Confirm whether the ensured feature is in both Blazor Server and WASM.

  • Yes
  • NO
  • NA

Do the code changes cause any memory leak and performance issue?

  • Yes
  • NO

Reviewer Checklist

  • All provided information are reviewed and ensured.

@SyncfusionBuild
Copy link
Contributor

Build Status: INQUEUE 🕒
Build Location: 948920-conflict

@SyncfusionBuild
Copy link
Contributor

Build Status: INPROGRESS 🔃
Build Location: 948920-conflict

@SyncfusionBuild
Copy link
Contributor

CI Status: FAILURE ❌
Source Compilation: SUCCESS ✅
Failure Reason: CI Failure with violation
Build Location: 948920-conflict
Image Alt Text Error(s): 0
Image Size Error(s): 2
Image Name Error(s): 0
FT Layout Syntax Error(s): 0
Front matter Error(s): 3
File Path Error(s): 0
CodeSnippet File Path Missing Error(s): 3
Toc Anchor Tags Validation Error(s): 0
MD Tag Validation Error(s): 0

@SyncfusionBuild
Copy link
Contributor

Build Status: INPROGRESS 🔃
Build Location: 948920-conflict

@SyncfusionBuild
Copy link
Contributor

CI Status: SUCCESS ✅
Source Compilation: SUCCESS ✅
Build Location: 948920-conflict
Technical Error(s): 0
Spelling Error(s): 0
Image Alt Text Error(s): 0
Image Size Error(s): 0
Image Name Error(s): 0
FT Layout Syntax Error(s): 0
Front matter Error(s): 0
File Path Error(s): 0
CodeSnippet File Path Missing Error(s): 0
Toc Anchor Tags Validation Error(s): 0
MD Tag Validation Error(s): 0

@Mydeensn Mydeensn self-requested a review March 25, 2025 10:43
@Mydeensn Mydeensn merged commit a3baf37 into master Mar 25, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants