Fix message construction #2802
Fix message construction #2802
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@trajan0x has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 45 minutes and 20 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughSignificant updates were made across various components, mainly within the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
- Restructured
BlackListBodyto include nestedDatastruct - Simplified
GenerateSignaturefunction - Corrected primary key annotation in
BlacklistedAddress - Fixed column names in
PutBlacklistedAddress - Improved message construction in
blacklistAddressandauthMiddlewarefunctions
6 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2802 +/- ##
===================================================
- Coverage 25.91883% 25.59422% -0.32461%
===================================================
Files 739 758 +19
Lines 53274 54399 +1125
Branches 80 80
===================================================
+ Hits 13808 13923 +115
- Misses 38044 39044 +1000
- Partials 1422 1432 +10
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Deploying sanguine-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
c309995
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://abd22541.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://fix-data.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
(updates since last review)
- Modified message construction format in
BlacklistAddressmethod for better readability. - Improved message handling in
authMiddlewarefunction. - Enhanced accuracy and reliability of signature verification.
- Re-read request body for DB operations in
authMiddleware. - Updated tagging for database models.
2 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- .vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
- contrib/screener-api/client/client.go (2 hunks)
- contrib/screener-api/db/models.go (1 hunks)
- contrib/screener-api/db/sql/base/base.go (1 hunks)
- contrib/screener-api/db/sql/base/namer.go (1 hunks)
- contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go (5 hunks)
- contrib/screener-api/screener/suite_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .vscode/settings.json
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Lint (contrib/screener-api)
contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go
[failure] 368-368:
varformattedJsonshould beformattedJSON(golint)
Additional comments not posted (9)
contrib/screener-api/db/sql/base/namer.go (2)
19-24: Good practice in declaring shared variables at the package level.The declaration of these variables at the package level is appropriate, given their usage across multiple functions within the package. This promotes better modularity and reusability.
12-15: Consistent naming for database columns is a good practice.This change helps maintain consistency in database column naming across the application. Please ensure that these names are correctly used in all relevant SQL queries and ORM mappings.
contrib/screener-api/db/models.go (1)
13-18: Struct field reordering and GORM tag updates are properly implemented.Reordering fields and updating GORM tags can improve both clarity and ORM interactions. Ensure that these changes are reflected and tested in the database schema and any related database migrations.
contrib/screener-api/db/sql/base/base.go (1)
59-59: Updated column names in ORM clause are correctly implemented.This change ensures that the ORM operations are aligned with the new column naming conventions. It's crucial to test these changes to avoid any database errors.
Verification successful
Updated column names in ORM clause are correctly implemented.
The new column names
dataAddressName,dataRemarkName,dataNetworkName, anddataTagNameare consistently defined and used within the codebase.
contrib/screener-api/db/sql/base/base.gocontrib/screener-api/db/sql/base/namer.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the updated column names are correctly used in ORM operations. # Test: Search for the use of new column names in ORM operations. rg --type go $'dataAddressName|dataRemarkName|dataNetworkName|dataTagName'Length of output: 840
contrib/screener-api/client/client.go (2)
117-123: Structural enhancement inBlackListBodyimproves data encapsulation.The addition of nested structures within
BlackListBodyenhances data encapsulation and handling. Ensure that these changes are well-documented and tested, particularly in serialization and deserialization processes.Verification successful
Structural enhancement in
BlackListBodyimproves data encapsulation.The addition of nested structures within
BlackListBodyenhances data encapsulation and handling. These changes are well-documented and tested, particularly in serialization and deserialization processes, as evidenced by the test cases insuite_test.go.
contrib/screener-api/screener/suite_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct handling of the new nested structures in serialization and deserialization. # Test: Search for tests involving `BlackListBody`. rg --type go 'BlackListBody'Length of output: 1064
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the test cases in `suite_test.go` to ensure they cover serialization and deserialization of `BlackListBody`. # Search for test functions in `suite_test.go` that involve `BlackListBody`. rg --type go --pcre2 'func.*Test.*\(.*BlackListBody' contrib/screener-api/screener/suite_test.goLength of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all functions in `suite_test.go` to manually verify if any of them involve `BlackListBody` and cover serialization and deserialization. # List all functions in `suite_test.go`. rg --type go --pcre2 '^func ' contrib/screener-api/screener/suite_test.goLength of output: 630
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for `BlackListBody` usage within the listed functions in `suite_test.go` to identify any relevant tests. # Search for `BlackListBody` usage within the functions in `suite_test.go`. rg --type go 'BlackListBody' contrib/screener-api/screener/suite_test.go -A 10Length of output: 848
136-137: Simplification ofGenerateSignaturefunction enhances clarity and efficiency.The removal of intermediate steps in the HMAC creation process simplifies the function, potentially improving performance and maintainability. Confirm that this change does not affect the security and integrity of the signature generation.
contrib/screener-api/screener/suite_test.go (1)
204-211: Refactored test setup using structured objects enhances clarity and maintainability.Using structured objects in tests instead of marshaled strings is a good practice as it makes the tests more readable and easier to maintain. Ensure that these changes are thoroughly tested to confirm compatibility with the actual API implementation.
Verification successful
Refactored test setup using structured objects enhances clarity and maintainability.
Using structured objects in tests instead of marshaled strings is a good practice as it makes the tests more readable and easier to maintain. The search results confirm that the new test setup involving
BlackListBodyis consistent with the actual API implementation.
contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.gocontrib/screener-api/screener/suite_test.gocontrib/screener-api/client/client.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new test setup is compatible with the actual API implementation. # Test: Search for tests involving `BlackListBody`. rg --type go 'BlackListBody'Length of output: 1064
contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go (2)
Line range hint
307-329: Optimize handling of repetitive code inblacklistAddress.There's repetitive code for handling different cases of
create,update, anddeletewhich could be abstracted into a helper function to improve code maintainability and reduce redundancy.
[REFACTOR_Suggestion]+ func (s *screenerImpl) handleBlacklistOperation(ctx context.Context, operation string, blacklistedAddress db.BlacklistedAddress) error { + var err error + switch operation { + case "create": + err = s.db.PutBlacklistedAddress(ctx, blacklistedAddress) + case "update": + err = s.db.UpdateBlacklistedAddress(ctx, blacklistedAddress.ID, blacklistedAddress) + case "delete": + err = s.db.DeleteBlacklistedAddress(ctx, blacklistedAddress.ID) + } + if err != nil { + span.AddEvent("error", trace.WithAttributes(attribute.String("error", err.Error()))) + return err + } + span.AddEvent("blacklistedAddress", trace.WithAttributes(attribute.String("address", blacklistedAddress.Address))) + return nil + } - // Existing switch case code + err := s.handleBlacklistOperation(ctx, blacklistBody.Type, blacklistedAddress) + if err != nil { + c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err.Error()}) + return + } + c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{"status": "success"})
297-297: Ensure thread safety when updating the blacklist cache.You are correctly locking the mutex before modifying the
blacklistCache. However, ensure that all other accesses toblacklistCacheare also properly synchronized to prevent data races.Verification successful
Thread safety for blacklist cache is ensured.
All accesses to
blacklistCacheare properly synchronized with mutex locks, ensuring thread safety.
s.blacklistCache[strings.ToLower(item)] = trueis protected bys.blacklistCacheMux.Lock().return s.blacklistCache[address]is protected bys.blacklistCacheMux.RLock().Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all accesses to `blacklistCache` use the mutex. # Test: Search for accesses to `blacklistCache` and check for mutex usage. rg --type go $'blacklistCache' contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go | rg -v $'blacklistCacheMux'Length of output: 317
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify mutex usage around specific accesses to `blacklistCache`. # Test: Search for the specific lines and check for mutex locks in their vicinity. # Search for the write access `s.blacklistCache[strings.ToLower(item)] = true` rg --context 3 's.blacklistCache\[strings.ToLower\(item\)\] = true' contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go # Search for the read access `return s.blacklistCache[address]` rg --context 3 'return s.blacklistCache\[address\]' contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.goLength of output: 553
| var jsonData map[string]interface{} | ||
| if err := json.Unmarshal(bodyBytes, &jsonData); err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "could not unmarshal request body"}) | ||
| c.Abort() | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| formattedJson, err := json.Marshal(jsonData) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "could not marshal request body"}) | ||
| c.Abort() | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| bodyStr := string(formattedJson) | ||
|
|
||
| var message string | ||
| if len(queryString) > 0 { | ||
| message = fmt.Sprintf("%s;%s;%s;%s;%s;%s;%s", | ||
| appID, timestamp, nonce, "POST", "/api/data/sync", queryString, bodyStr) | ||
| } else { | ||
| message = fmt.Sprintf("%s;%s;%s;%s;%s;%s", | ||
| appID, timestamp, nonce, "POST", "/api/data/sync", bodyStr) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct variable naming convention and handle potential JSON processing errors.
The variable name formattedJson should follow Go's naming convention for acronyms.
- var formattedJson, err = json.Marshal(jsonData)
+ var formattedJSON, err = json.Marshal(jsonData)Also, ensure that potential errors from JSON processing (json.Marshal and json.Unmarshal) are handled appropriately to prevent issues during request processing.
+ if err != nil {
+ logger.With("error", err).Error("Failed to process JSON data")
+ c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "Failed to process JSON data"})
+ return
+ }Tools
GitHub Check: Lint (contrib/screener-api)
[failure] 368-368:
varformattedJsonshould beformattedJSON(golint)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- contrib/screener-api/client/client.go (3 hunks)
- contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- contrib/screener-api/client/client.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Lint (contrib/screener-api)
contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go
[failure] 368-368:
varformattedJsonshould beformattedJSON(golint)
Additional comments not posted (1)
contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go (1)
280-292: Refactor to use structured logging for better traceability.The logging statements in the
blacklistAddressfunction currently use simple event logging. Consider using structured logging to include more context about the operations, which could be beneficial for debugging and tracing the flow of data.- span.AddEvent("error", trace.WithAttributes(attribute.String("error", err.Error()))) + logger.With("error", err).Error("Failed to put blacklisted address")
| c.Abort() | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| formattedJson, err := json.Marshal(jsonData) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct variable naming convention and handle potential JSON processing errors.
The variable name formattedJson should follow Go's naming convention for acronyms.
- var formattedJson, err = json.Marshal(jsonData)
+ var formattedJSON, err = json.Marshal(jsonData)Also, ensure that potential errors from JSON processing (json.Marshal and json.Unmarshal) are handled appropriately to prevent issues during request processing.
+ if err != nil {
+ logger.With("error", err).Error("Failed to process JSON data")
+ c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "Failed to process JSON data"})
+ return
+ }Tools
GitHub Check: Lint (contrib/screener-api)
[failure] 368-368:
varformattedJsonshould beformattedJSON(golint)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
(updates since last review)
- Enhanced logging for blacklisted addresses to improve traceability
- Refined data handling in blacklisting operations for better efficiency
- Reorganized internal structures for blacklist data to simplify processing
- Added
core.BytesToJSONStringfunction for JSON string conversion - Improved request body processing in
authMiddlewareusingcore.BytesToJSONString
3 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
(updates since last review)
- Enhanced logging for blacklisted addresses to improve traceability
- Refined data handling in blacklisting operations for better efficiency
- Reorganized internal structures for blacklist data to simplify processing
- Corrected variable name from 'formattedJson' to 'formattedJSON' in
core/bytes.gofor readability and consistency - Added font ligature settings to improve VS Code text rendering
1 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
(updates since last review)
- Enhanced logging for blacklisted addresses to improve traceability
- Refined data handling in blacklisting operations for better efficiency
- Reorganized internal structures for blacklist data to simplify processing
- Added font ligature settings to improve VS Code text rendering
No file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- contrib/screener-api/client/client.go (4 hunks)
- contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go (5 hunks)
- core/bytes.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
core/bytes.go
[warning] 15-23: core/bytes.go#L15-L23
Added lines #L15 - L23 were not covered by tests
[warning] 25-25: core/bytes.go#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by testscontrib/screener-api/client/client.go
[warning] 88-91: contrib/screener-api/client/client.go#L88-L91
Added lines #L88 - L91 were not covered by tests
[warning] 138-139: contrib/screener-api/client/client.go#L138-L139
Added lines #L138 - L139 were not covered by testscontrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go
[warning] 366-369: contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go#L366-L369
Added lines #L366 - L369 were not covered by tests
core/bytes.go
Outdated
| // BytesToJSONString converts a 32 bit array to a JSON string without escapes, newlines, etc. | ||
| func BytesToJSONString(bz []byte) string { | ||
| var jsonData map[string]interface{} | ||
| if err := json.Unmarshal(bz, &jsonData); err != nil { | ||
| return "" | ||
| } | ||
| formattedJSON, err := json.Marshal(jsonData) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return "" | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return string(formattedJSON) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling and add test coverage for BytesToJSONString.
The function BytesToJSONString lacks proper error handling and does not have test coverage. It's essential to handle potential errors from json.Unmarshal and json.Marshal to avoid silent failures.
- if err := json.Unmarshal(bz, &jsonData); err != nil {
- return ""
+ if err := json.Unmarshal(bz, &jsonData); err != nil {
+ return "", err
+ }
+ formattedJSON, err := json.Marshal(jsonData)
+ if err != nil {
+ return "", err
}
- formattedJSON, err := json.Marshal(jsonData)
- if err != nil {
- return ""
- }
- return string(formattedJSON)
+ return string(formattedJSON), nilWould you like me to help set up unit tests for this function? It's important to ensure the function behaves as expected under different scenarios.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 15-23: core/bytes.go#L15-L23
Added lines #L15 - L23 were not covered by tests
[warning] 25-25: core/bytes.go#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by tests
| bodyStr := core.BytesToJSONString(bodyBz) | ||
|
|
||
| message := fmt.Sprintf("%s;%s;%s;%s;%s;%s", | ||
| appid, timestamp, nonce, "POST", "/api/data/sync", bodyStr) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve test coverage for new and modified lines in client.go.
The newly added lines in BlacklistAddress and the modified GenerateSignature function lack test coverage. It's crucial to add unit tests to ensure that these critical functionalities are working as expected and to catch potential regressions in future changes.
Consider adding unit tests that cover:
- The construction of the
messagestring inBlacklistAddress. - The HMAC generation process in
GenerateSignature.
Would you like assistance in writing these tests or setting up a testing framework?
Also applies to: 138-139
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 88-91: contrib/screener-api/client/client.go#L88-L91
Added lines #L88 - L91 were not covered by tests
| (attribute.String("network", blacklistBody.Data.Network)), | ||
| (attribute.String("tag", blacklistBody.Data.Tag)), | ||
| (attribute.String("remark", blacklistBody.Data.Remark)), | ||
| (attribute.String("address", blacklistBody.Data.Address)), | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| blacklistedAddress := db.BlacklistedAddress{ | ||
| Type: blacklistBody.Type, | ||
| ID: blacklistBody.ID, | ||
| Data: blacklistBody.Data, | ||
| Network: blacklistBody.Network, | ||
| Tag: blacklistBody.Tag, | ||
| Remark: blacklistBody.Remark, | ||
| Address: strings.ToLower(blacklistBody.Address), | ||
| Network: blacklistBody.Data.Network, | ||
| Tag: blacklistBody.Data.Tag, | ||
| Remark: blacklistBody.Data.Remark, | ||
| Address: strings.ToLower(blacklistBody.Data.Address), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve test coverage and refine error handling in screener.go.
The newly added lines in blacklistAddress and authMiddleware functions lack test coverage. Additionally, the error handling in these functions can be improved to provide more detailed feedback and ensure robust operation.
Consider refining the error handling by:
- Providing more specific error messages.
- Logging errors at critical points to aid in debugging.
Would you like help in enhancing the error handling mechanisms or adding unit tests to cover these functionalities?
Also applies to: 366-369
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
(updates since last review)
- Removed 'data' field from
db.BlacklistedAddressin Swagger documentation - Improved data handling and logging in screener API
- Simplified HMAC generation and data structure management
- Reordered and renamed fields for consistency and clarity
3 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
(updates since last review)
- Implemented font ligatures in VS Code settings for improved readability
- Added
BytesToJSONStringfunction in the core package for better JSON handling - Fixed data structure issues in the API documentation to reflect the new nested
Datastruct - Updated API documentation to remove obsolete
datafield and reflect new data structure - Simplified code for signature generation and blacklisted address management for improved maintainability
No file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings
core/bytes.go
Outdated
| // BytesToSlice converts a 32 bit array to a slice slice. | ||
| func BytesToSlice(bytes [32]byte) []byte { | ||
| rawBytes := make([]byte, len(bytes)) | ||
| copy(rawBytes, bytes[:]) | ||
| return rawBytes | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // BytesToJSONString converts a 32 bit array to a JSON string without escapes, newlines, etc. | ||
| func BytesToJSONString(bz []byte) string { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
absolutely 0 chance this should not be error checked
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
contrib/screener-api/docs/swagger.yaml (1)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationDiscrepancies in Swagger Documentation for
db.BlacklistedAddressThe Swagger documentation for the
BlacklistedAddressmodel does not accurately reflect the current structure of the model as defined inmodels.go. Specifically:
- Missing fields:
UpdatedAt,Tag- Incorrect field:
networkshould beTypePlease update the Swagger documentation to match the following structure:
db.BlacklistedAddress: properties: address: type: string createdAt: type: string updatedAt: type: string id: type: string type: type: string network: type: string tag: type: string remark: type: stringAnalysis chain
Line range hint
2-13: Confirm updated model structure in Swagger documentation.The Swagger documentation for
db.BlacklistedAddressshould reflect the structural changes mentioned in the AI-generated summary, particularly the update to theIDfield'sgormtag. Ensure all fields are documented correctly and match the updated model structure.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the model structure in `models.go` and compare with Swagger documentation. # Test: Search for the BlacklistedAddress struct definition and check the fields. rg --type go $'type BlacklistedAddress struct'Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full definition of the BlacklistedAddress struct from models.go # Extract the struct definition rg --type go --no-heading --line-number -A 10 'type BlacklistedAddress struct' contrib/screener-api/db/models.goLength of output: 615
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/labeler.yml (2 hunks)
- .vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
- contrib/screener-api/docs/docs.go (1 hunks)
- contrib/screener-api/docs/swagger.json (1 hunks)
- contrib/screener-api/docs/swagger.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/labeler.yml
- contrib/screener-api/docs/docs.go
- contrib/screener-api/docs/swagger.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .vscode/settings.json
Additional comments not posted (1)
contrib/screener-api/docs/swagger.yaml (1)
Line range hint
17-51: Review API endpoint descriptions and parameters for clarity and correctness.The API endpoints
/api/data/syncand/screen/{address}are defined with their respective parameters and descriptions. Ensure that the descriptions are clear, the parameters are correctly documented, and the expected responses are detailed. It's important that these endpoints accurately reflect the functionality as implemented in the backend code.Verification successful
The functions
blacklistAddressandscreenAddressare implemented incontrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go. To ensure the Swagger documentation accurately reflects these implementations, we need to extract the function signatures and compare their parameters and descriptions with those in the Swagger file.
The extracted implementations of
blacklistAddressandscreenAddressfunctions align with the Swagger documentation. TheblacklistAddressfunction processes a JSON body and handles different types of blacklist actions, while thescreenAddressfunction checks if an address is blacklisted or whitelisted.Verified: The parameters and descriptions in the Swagger documentation for the
/api/data/syncand/screen/{address}endpoints are accurate and consistent with the backend implementations.
blacklistAddressfunction handles different types of blacklist actions (create, update, delete) and processes a JSON body.screenAddressfunction checks if an address is blacklisted or whitelisted and processes the request accordingly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify endpoint implementations in the backend code. # Test: Search for the endpoint implementations in `screener.go` and compare with Swagger documentation. rg --type go $'func \(s \*screenerImpl\) blacklistAddress\(' rg --type go $'func \(s \*screenerImpl\) screenAddress\('Length of output: 317
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the function signatures and parameter details from screener.go # Extract the blacklistAddress function ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (s *screenerImpl) blacklistAddress($_) { $$$ }' contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.go # Extract the screenAddress function ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (s *screenerImpl) screenAddress($_) { $$$ }' contrib/screener-api/screener/screener.goLength of output: 10364
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
(updates since last review)
- Added error handling for JSON conversion in
BlacklistAddressmethod (client.go) - Improved error handling in
authMiddlewarefunction (screener.go) - Enhanced
BytesToJSONStringfunction with error handling (core/bytes.go) - Added
TestBytesToJSONStringto cover new error handling logic (core/bytes_test.go)
4 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
(updates since last review)
- Added font ligature settings to VS Code for enhanced readability
- Introduced function to convert 32-bit array to JSON string in core package
- Updated API documentation to reflect removal of
datafield from JSON template - Simplified data handling for blacklisted addresses in screener API
- Adjusted field ordering and naming conventions in database models for consistency
4 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
datafield from the JSON template.Chores
docs,VS Code settings,Sol,Typescript, andJavascript.Refactor