-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Remove the default output buffer limit #45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@@ -240,10 +240,9 @@ extension OutputProtocol where Self == FileDescriptorOutput { | |||
@available(SubprocessSpan, *) | |||
#endif | |||
extension OutputProtocol where Self == StringOutput<UTF8> { | |||
/// Create a `Subprocess` output that collects output as | |||
/// UTF8 String with 128kb limit. | |||
/// Create a `Subprocess` output that collects output as UTF8 String |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the documentation comment here should say that the buffer is unlimited, so the amount of memory required is proportional to the size of the output.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good
…limited buffer size
Updated header doc to indicate that |
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ public protocol OutputProtocol: Sendable, ~Copyable { | |||
#endif | |||
extension OutputProtocol { | |||
/// The max amount of data to collect for this output. | |||
public var maxSize: Int { 128 * 1024 } | |||
public var maxSize: Int { .max } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@iCharlesHu Why are we fixing a hang with increasing the buffer size to infinity? That's not quite the right fix I think.
if you're not streaming and you blow through the max size you should get an error, not a hang. That's also what AsyncProcess does.
in fact, you will now see a hang (followed by an OOM kill) if you run for example cat /dev/zero
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand your point, but struggling a bit to find the right answer here. If we put a limit in, and during testing someone only uses file sizes < 128k (for example), then a customer of the app is the one who hits the error. If we are unlimited, then it'll just use infinite memory, which is also a problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Safe and unexpected is better than unsafe an unexpected IMHO. So a limit is IMHO a must.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you get an error telling you "too much data to collect", it's immediately actionable. If your process just grinds to a halt or gets OOM killed, you need to do much more work to even figure out what the problem is.
We decided to keep the default limit but throw an error when the buffer limit is reached (instead of simply stop reading, which could lead to child process being hang) |
This PR removes the output buffer limit by default when setting
.string
or.bytes
asoutput
orerror
.Resolves #44