Skip to content

Remove the default output buffer limit #45

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

iCharlesHu
Copy link
Contributor

This PR removes the output buffer limit by default when setting .string or .bytes as output or error.

Resolves #44

@iCharlesHu iCharlesHu requested review from parkera and itingliu May 15, 2025 04:24
@iCharlesHu iCharlesHu marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2025 04:24
@@ -240,10 +240,9 @@ extension OutputProtocol where Self == FileDescriptorOutput {
@available(SubprocessSpan, *)
#endif
extension OutputProtocol where Self == StringOutput<UTF8> {
/// Create a `Subprocess` output that collects output as
/// UTF8 String with 128kb limit.
/// Create a `Subprocess` output that collects output as UTF8 String
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the documentation comment here should say that the buffer is unlimited, so the amount of memory required is proportional to the size of the output.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good

@iCharlesHu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated header doc to indicate that .string and .bytes have unlimited buffer size.

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ public protocol OutputProtocol: Sendable, ~Copyable {
#endif
extension OutputProtocol {
/// The max amount of data to collect for this output.
public var maxSize: Int { 128 * 1024 }
public var maxSize: Int { .max }
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@iCharlesHu Why are we fixing a hang with increasing the buffer size to infinity? That's not quite the right fix I think.

if you're not streaming and you blow through the max size you should get an error, not a hang. That's also what AsyncProcess does.

in fact, you will now see a hang (followed by an OOM kill) if you run for example cat /dev/zero.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I understand your point, but struggling a bit to find the right answer here. If we put a limit in, and during testing someone only uses file sizes < 128k (for example), then a customer of the app is the one who hits the error. If we are unlimited, then it'll just use infinite memory, which is also a problem.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Safe and unexpected is better than unsafe an unexpected IMHO. So a limit is IMHO a must.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you get an error telling you "too much data to collect", it's immediately actionable. If your process just grinds to a halt or gets OOM killed, you need to do much more work to even figure out what the problem is.

@iCharlesHu
Copy link
Contributor Author

We decided to keep the default limit but throw an error when the buffer limit is reached (instead of simply stop reading, which could lead to child process being hang)

@iCharlesHu iCharlesHu closed this Jun 10, 2025
@iCharlesHu iCharlesHu deleted the charles/remove-buffer-limit branch June 10, 2025 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

run appears to be stuck (due to buffer limit?)
3 participants