Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Concerns regarding Domain as private input in zk circuit #8

Open
Dimo99 opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Concerns regarding Domain as private input in zk circuit #8

Dimo99 opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@Dimo99
Copy link

Dimo99 commented Jun 30, 2023

A potential issue has caught my attention: Currently, the domain is defined as a private input within the zk circuit. As a result, this part of the circuit does not undergo verification. I am concerned about the possible implications of this, especially when the sync committee slashing mechanism is implemented. ethereum/consensus-specs#3321
It seems feasible that the sync committee could sign blocks with different domains without running the risk of being slashed
This could, in theory, compromise the security of the circuits.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant