Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Helper functions for interpreting results #74

Open
jhollway opened this issue Jul 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Helper functions for interpreting results #74

jhollway opened this issue Jul 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jhollway
Labels
Type: Enhancement Issue is about improving an existing feature. Type: Feature Request Issue is about adding a new feature. Type: Question Issue asks a question about existing code.

Comments

@jhollway
Copy link
Collaborator

jhollway commented Jul 7, 2022

No description provided.

@auzaheta
Copy link
Collaborator

auzaheta commented Jul 7, 2022

Notes:

Average marginal effects as proposed by Duxbury S., 2021 for ERGMs or relative importance effects as proposed by Indlekofer N. and Brandes U.,2013 for SAOMs.

Predicting functionalities with good practices recommendations, e.g., if same is used then alter should be included. Predicting output for DyNAM-rate with intercept could be on an interpretable scale (seconds, minutes, hours, ...) when original time variable allows for it.

@jhollway jhollway added Type: Enhancement Issue is about improving an existing feature. Type: Feature Request Issue is about adding a new feature. Type: Question Issue asks a question about existing code. labels Jul 14, 2022
@jhollway jhollway self-assigned this Aug 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jhollway jhollway

Labels
Type: Enhancement Issue is about improving an existing feature. Type: Feature Request Issue is about adding a new feature. Type: Question Issue asks a question about existing code.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jhollway @auzaheta