Skip to content

[RFC]: add a search API to the REPL #2059

Open

Description

Description

This RFC proposes adding built-in support for searching within the stdlib REPL environment. Something along the lines of

In [1]: search( 'absolute value' )
<search_results>

While the REPL supports TAB completion, including the display of potential matches, one still has to know, more or less, where to find things, which can be difficult due to the use of namespaces (e.g., base, base.strided, random, etc).

In short, it can be hard to find the REPL function you want to use. This RFC proposes reducing that barrier by building in search capabilities to the REPL.

Related Issues

No.

Questions

  • Should search be fuzzy? Probably. If someone types 'abolute value', we shouldn't return zero results because the user misspelled absolute.
  • What should be returned? We may want modes/flags that allow users to specify what they want to return. E.g., REPL aliases, package names, etc.

Other

  • We have some prior art for this in the project. Namely, for the API documentation website we use https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/tree/develop/lib/node_modules/%40stdlib/_tools/search/pkg-index for generating the search index. We could potentially leverage that for building a similar idea, and may be beneficial to write our own TF-IDF package.
    • As search would be built into the REPL, we'd need to create our own search implementation, as currently we rely on lunr as a dev dep and making a non-dev-dep is not desired, as we try to minimize any and all production dependencies.

Checklist

  • I have read and understood the Code of Conduct.
  • Searched for existing issues and pull requests.
  • The issue name begins with RFC:.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    EnhancementIssue or pull request for enhancing existing functionality.JavaScriptIssue involves or relates to JavaScript.Needs DiscussionNeeds further discussion.REPLIssue or pull request specific to the project REPL.RFCRequest for comments. Feature requests and proposed changes.difficulty: 3Likely to be challenging but manageable.priority: NormalNormal priority concern or feature request.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions