Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test_: Code Migration from status-cli-tests with create private groups #6028

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: cli_test_migration
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shashankshampi
Copy link

changes:

Added Test to create a private group

Migrated contract request test from the old repository https://github.com/status-im/status-cli-tests
Added response validation
Helper and methods to support migration

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

status-im-auto commented Nov 4, 2024

Jenkins Builds

Click to see older builds (16)
Commit #️⃣ Finished (UTC) Duration Platform Result
✔️ fe0778a #1 2024-11-04 06:42:21 ~4 min tests-rpc 📄log
✔️ fe0778a #1 2024-11-04 06:42:53 ~5 min macos 📦zip
✔️ fe0778a #1 2024-11-04 06:43:45 ~6 min linux 📦zip
✔️ fe0778a #1 2024-11-04 06:44:10 ~6 min android 📦aar
✔️ fe0778a #1 2024-11-04 06:44:10 ~6 min ios 📦zip
✔️ fe0778a #1 2024-11-04 06:45:44 ~8 min macos 📦zip
✖️ fe0778a #1 2024-11-04 06:48:36 ~10 min windows 📦zip
✔️ fe0778a #1 2024-11-04 07:12:31 ~34 min tests 📄log
✔️ 4dbdda9 #2 2024-11-05 07:12:09 ~4 min tests-rpc 📄log
✔️ 4dbdda9 #2 2024-11-05 07:13:03 ~5 min macos 📦zip
✔️ 4dbdda9 #2 2024-11-05 07:16:48 ~8 min macos 📦zip
✖️ 4dbdda9 #2 2024-11-05 07:19:05 ~11 min windows 📦zip
✔️ 4dbdda9 #2 2024-11-05 07:40:28 ~32 min tests 📄log
✔️ a610961 #2 2024-11-05 07:14:02 ~6 min linux 📦zip
✔️ a610961 #2 2024-11-05 07:14:03 ~6 min ios 📦zip
✔️ a610961 #2 2024-11-05 07:14:46 ~7 min android 📦aar
Commit #️⃣ Finished (UTC) Duration Platform Result
✔️ 4d5d3ad #3 2024-11-05 07:16:20 ~4 min tests-rpc 📄log
✔️ 4d5d3ad #3 2024-11-05 07:18:28 ~5 min macos 📦zip
✔️ bd245be #3 2024-11-05 07:20:07 ~6 min linux 📦zip
✔️ bd245be #3 2024-11-05 07:20:25 ~6 min ios 📦zip
✔️ bd245be #4 2024-11-05 07:20:37 ~4 min tests-rpc 📄log
✔️ bd245be #3 2024-11-05 07:21:36 ~6 min android 📦aar
✔️ bd245be #4 2024-11-05 07:22:56 ~4 min macos 📦zip
✔️ bd245be #3 2024-11-05 07:24:59 ~8 min macos 📦zip
✖️ bd245be #3 2024-11-05 07:30:08 ~10 min windows 📦zip
✔️ bd245be #3 2024-11-05 08:15:30 ~34 min tests 📄log

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 60.07%. Comparing base (66d612c) to head (bd245be).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                   @@
##           cli_test_migration    #6028      +/-   ##
======================================================
+ Coverage               59.99%   60.07%   +0.08%     
======================================================
  Files                     812      812              
  Lines                  109328   109328              
======================================================
+ Hits                    65589    65683      +94     
+ Misses                  36015    35961      -54     
+ Partials                 7724     7684      -40     
Flag Coverage Δ
functional 10.75% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unit 59.97% <ø> (+0.08%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 29 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link

@fbarbu15 fbarbu15 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left some comments
Also let's not merge this one to the main branch until we sort the main PR
Thanks

self.first_node.stop()
self.second_node.stop()

def send_and_wait_for_message(self, nodes, display_name, index, timeout=10):
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in this case we should just assume that contact_request works fine and the validation should focus on private_group functionality


return timestamp, message_id, contact_request_message, response

def create_and_validate_private_group(self, node, members_pubkeys, group_name, timeout=10):
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should extract those functions in some common place/helper so we don't duplicate it

@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ def validate_chat_data(self, expected_chat_id, expected_display_name, expected_t
)

actual_contact_request_state = last_message.get("contactRequestState")
assert actual_contact_request_state == 1, (
f"Unexpected contact request state: Expected '1', found '{actual_contact_request_state}'"
assert actual_contact_request_state >= 1, (
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe we should add a new param and in some places to keep the assertion as exact and other places where we don't care that much to keep it as loose

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants