[RFC] Studio Code display improvement

[YurikaL]

Studio code has recently added to Stash fields, which is good, but not good enough! There are specific suggestions for improving how to to display scene code in certain places.

Long Form

• Add Code field to Movies. Studio code is even more related to movies than scenes. In recent PR ([Feature] Add fields director and (studio) code to scenes #3051), code was added to scenes, but not to movies.
• Add Code field to Scene Filename Parser.
• Display Code in the scenes list, in all Grid, List, Wall, and Tagger view.
• Read and display scene code in the scraper search results.
• Add sceneByCode to scraper API for searching scenes by it's codes. Similar to sceneByName, but for studio code.
• In Scene view, use HTML definition list for scene details. This will allow precise selection of scene code (and other fields' content) with a double-click.
• MAYBE add an auto-generated field "Title with Studio Code", which should be result of concatenation of Title and Studio Code fields. For those who prefer to have these fields at once.
• MAYBE add a framework for customizing displayed fields in all views. Yes, a user-defined visually editable layout, similar to e.g. Wordpress block editor. For those who want to fine-tune how fields including Studio Code are displayed in all views.

Examples

Not a real screenshots, just a quick edit in browser

Code in Grid view

Code in List view

Code in Wall view

Code in Tagger view

Code in search results

References

Adding blocks in Wordpress block editor

[LeGrosFromage]

Please, not on the grid view. Or at least not by default. I really don't want (more of) a gap between the thumbnail and the text underneath.

[YurikaL]

Update:

• New suggestion: add Code field to Scene Filename Parser

---

@LeGrosFromage That's exactly why there was a suggestion for a Wordpress-like UI customization framework!

[LeGrosFromage]

Update:

• New suggestion: add Code field to Scene Filename Parser

@LeGrosFromage That's exactly why there was a suggestion for a Wordpress-like UI customization framework!

a) It's listed as "Maybe".
b) "Wordpress-like UI customization" means nothing to me. I have no idea what that is like or how it works. I was just making a comment.

[YurikaL]

a) Because it's obviously much more difficult to implement than the other suggestions, and it's slightly out of scope, but definitely worth mentioning. Maybe the "Maybe" statement should be removed? 🤔
b) This is explained at the link in the References section, especially in the first video. The more you know!