Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

burn rate in testnet not sustainable #3725

Open
deantchi opened this issue May 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

burn rate in testnet not sustainable #3725

deantchi opened this issue May 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Unwanted or unintended property causing functional harm icebox Issues that are not being worked on testnet

Comments

@deantchi
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug

Starting version 2.1, a higher than previous burn rate satoshis_per_byte is required to mine blocks. While this is not an urgent matter current, it is not sustainable rate. tBTC is becoming more and more difficult to mine and Hiro has only a finite amount on hand. We don't want to eventually be in a position where we have to spend real money to obtain tBTC from somewhere else. There are at most only 2 testnet miners on the network at any given time and I don't believe there to be any contention.

Steps To Reproduce

The burn rate is currently set to satoshis_per_byte = 20, pre-2.1 was set to only 5. If we reduce it back down, the miner would not mine any blocks.

Expected behavior

I expect the required satoshis_per_byte should be able to mine blocks with the old rate of 5, or even as low as 1.

@deantchi deantchi added bug Unwanted or unintended property causing functional harm testnet labels May 23, 2023
@diwakergupta
Copy link
Member

Not sure this qualifies as a blockchain bug? 🤔 Ultimately block commits have to be included by miners on the Bitcoin testnet. Looking at https://mempool.space/testnet, 1 sat/vbyte should be usually fine.

I think a more robust solution is to explore a signet based testnet instead (something @lgalabru has suggested before too).

@pavitthrap pavitthrap added the icebox Issues that are not being worked on label May 23, 2023
@pavitthrap
Copy link
Contributor

options

  • running a btc testnet miner
  • switch to signet based testnet

@iainestera
Copy link

Sir, i cant faucet signet sbtc to do the testnet cause it down, can you send me 0.1 sbtc to test pls. It took me 3 days and still cant faucet anything. Many thanks for your help. tb1qhz65f7gnxy6582w6gy7vhfh5ec3scy5uduf888

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Unwanted or unintended property causing functional harm icebox Issues that are not being worked on testnet
Projects
Status: Status: 🆕 New
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants