Platform | Supported |
---|---|
Linux 64-bit | ✅ |
MacOS 64-bit | ✅ |
Windows 64-bit | ✅ |
MacOS Apple Silicon (ARM64) | builds are provided but not tested |
Linux ARMv7 | builds are provided but not tested |
Linux ARM64 | builds are provided but not tested |
Normal releases in this repository that add features such as improved RPC endpoints, improved boot-up time, new event
observer fields or event types, etc., are released on a monthly schedule. The currently staged changes for such releases
are in the develop branch. It is generally safe to run
a stacks-node
from that branch, though it has received less rigorous testing than release tags. If bugs are found in
the develop
branch, please do report them as issues on this repository.
For fixes that impact the correct functioning or liveness of the network, hotfixes may be issued. These are patches to the main branch which are backported to the develop branch after merging. These hotfixes are categorized by priority according to the following rubric:
- High Priority. Any fix for an issue that could deny service to the network as a whole, e.g., an issue where a particular kind of invalid transaction would cause nodes to stop processing requests or shut down unintentionally. Any fix for an issue that could cause honest miners to produce invalid blocks.
- Medium Priority. Any fix for an issue that could cause miners to waste funds.
- Low Priority. Any fix for an issue that could deny service to individual nodes.
This repository uses a 5 part version number.
X.Y.Z.A.n
X = 2 and does not change in practice unless there’s another Stacks 2.0 type event
Y increments on consensus-breaking changes
Z increments on non-consensus-breaking changes that require a fresh chainstate (akin to semantic MAJOR)
A increments on non-consensus-breaking changes that do not require a fresh chainstate, but introduce new features (akin to semantic MINOR)
n increments on patches and hot-fixes (akin to semantic PATCH)
For example, a node operator running version 2.0.10.0.0
would not need to wipe and refresh their chainstate
to upgrade to 2.0.10.1.0
or 2.0.10.0.1
. However, upgrading to 2.0.11.0.0
would require a new chainstate.
For non-consensus breaking releases, this project uses the following release process:
-
The release must be timed so that it does not interfere with a prepare phase. The timing of the next Stacking cycle can be found here. A release should happen at least 24 hours before the start of a new cycle, to avoid interfering with the prepare phase. So, start by being aware of when the release can happen.
-
Before creating the release, the release manager must determine the version number for this release, and create a release branch in the format:
release/X.Y.Z.A.n
. The factors that determine the version number are discussed in Versioning. We assume, in this section, that the change is not consensus-breaking. So, the release manager must first determine whether there are any "non-consensus-breaking changes that require a fresh chainstate". This means, in other words, that the database schema has changed, but an automatic migration was not implemented. Then, the release manager should determine whether this is a feature release, as opposed to a hotfix or a patch. Given the answers to these questions, the version number can be computed. -
The release manager enumerates the PRs or issues that would block the release. A label should be applied to each such issue/PR as
X.Y.Z.A.n-blocker
. The release manager should ping these issue/PR owners for updates on whether or not those issues/PRs have any blockers or are waiting on feedback. -
The release manager must update the
CHANGELOG.md
file with summaries what wasAdded
,Changed
, andFixed
. The pull requests merged intodevelop
can be found here. Note, however, that GitHub apparently does not allow sorting by merge time, so, when sorting by some proxy criterion, some care should be used to understand which PR's were merged after the last release. -
Once the blocker PRs have merged, the release manager will create a new tag by manually triggering the
CI
Github Actions workflow against therelease/X.Y.Z.A.n
branch. -
Once the release candidate has been built, and docker images, etc. are available, the release manager will notify various ecosystem participants to test the release candidate on various staging infrastructure:
- Stacks Foundation staging environments.
- Hiro PBC testnet network.
- Hiro PBC mainnet mock miner.
The release candidate should be announced in the
#stacks-core-devs
channel in the Stacks Discord. For coordinating rollouts on specific infrastructure, the release manager should contact the above participants directly either through e-mail or Discord DM. The release manager should also confirm that the built release on the Github releases page is marked asPre-Release
. -
The release manager will test that the release candidate successfully syncs with the current chain from genesis both in testnet and mainnet. This requires starting the release candidate with an empty chainstate and confirming that it synchronizes with the current chain tip.
-
If bugs or issues emerge from the rollout on staging infrastructure, the release will be delayed until those regressions are resolved. As regressions are resolved, additional release candidates should be tagged. The release manager is responsible for updating the
develop -> master
PR with information about the discovered issues, even if other community members and developers may be addressing the discovered issues. -
Once the final release candidate has rolled out successfully without issue on staging infrastructure, the tagged release shall no longer marked as Pre-Release on the Github releases page. Announcements will then be shared in the
#stacks-core-devs
channel in the Stacks Discord, as well as the mailing list. -
Finally, the release branch
release/X.Y.Z.A.n
will be PR'ed into themaster
branch, and once merged, a PR formaster->develop
will be opened.