Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider including transitive dependencies in parent tasks #23

Open
PeterJCLaw opened this issue Feb 16, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Consider including transitive dependencies in parent tasks #23

PeterJCLaw opened this issue Feb 16, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
Tooling Relates to the import/validation tooling or capabilities rather than actual task entries

Comments

@PeterJCLaw
Copy link
Member

PeterJCLaw commented Feb 16, 2020

For example comp/ops/main (e.g: srobo/tasks#543, though note that that has been manually adjusted to fix this) depends on comp/venue/network (e.g: srobo/tasks#419), though finding the latter when considering the former is non-obvious.

It might be the case that we just need to get better at doing this explicitly in the repo for cases where it makes sense, though it might also be worth doing it automatically.

There are definitely cases (e.g: at least root tickets) where this is less useful, so making this something that tickets can opt into or out of might also be useful.

@PeterJCLaw PeterJCLaw added the Tooling Relates to the import/validation tooling or capabilities rather than actual task entries label Nov 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Tooling Relates to the import/validation tooling or capabilities rather than actual task entries
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant