Polish visualization of repository nodes in Spring outline

[odrotbohm]

It would be cool if the nodes representing Spring Data repositories in the Spring outline were polished as follows:

• The root node for the repository looks something like this @+ 'payments' (Payment<?>) Repository<Payment<?>,PaymentIdentifier> (class). This is a lot of detail for a high-level node. I wonder if it should be changed to PaymentRepository (@+ payments), i.e., $typeName (@beanLookup).
• The individual query methods are currently only listing the names. It would be nice if it were the full signature. So instead of findByStatus, it'd be findByStatus(Status) : List<Payment<?>>

[martinlippert]

• The root node for the repository looks something like this @+ 'payments' (Payment<?>) Repository<Payment<?>,PaymentIdentifier> (class). This is a lot of detail for a high-level node. I wonder if it should be changed to PaymentRepository (@+ payments), i.e., $typeName (@beanLookup).

I thought it might be useful to see some type information in the root node, so that you get a more precise idea for which domain type the repository is defined. E.g. you have something like:

public interface Drinks extends CrudRepository<Drink, DrinkIdentifier>

The simple version would be:

• Drinks (@+ 'drinks')

The current version would be:

• @+ 'drinks' (Drink) Repository<Drink, DrinkIdentifier>
(@beanLookup (@domainType) @repositoryDeclaration

Don't you think that we should at least include the exact domain type in here?

[martinlippert]

I simplified the symbol for repositories (for this example) now to @+ 'drinks' Repository(Drink), which basically goes back to @+ 'beanName' Repository(domainType).

If we want to do further refinements here, happy to incorporate them while working on the more comprehensive structural view moving forward.