Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make ReactiveUserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration conditional on reactive web app #43350

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BenchmarkingBuffalo
Copy link
Contributor

The UserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration is only to be active in a reactive web application

I tried to align my tests to this commit ff9fde0
But I am not sure, if that is now entirely correct.
If you have remarks, please hit me up :)

See gh-43345

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Dec 2, 2024
@BenchmarkingBuffalo BenchmarkingBuffalo force-pushed the 43345-make-ReactiveUserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration-conditional-on-reactive-web-app branch from fcf5985 to e7b14f1 Compare December 2, 2024 17:57
The UserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration is only to be active in a reactive web application

See spring-projectsgh-43345
@philwebb philwebb changed the title Making ReactiveUserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration conditional Make ReactiveUserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration conditional on reactive web app Dec 2, 2024
@philwebb philwebb added type: enhancement A general enhancement and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Dec 2, 2024
@philwebb philwebb added this to the 3.5.x milestone Dec 2, 2024
@BenchmarkingBuffalo
Copy link
Contributor Author

The problem I am facing in this PR is that an RSocket-Application is not automatically recognized as a reactive webapplication.
This leads me to the question whether it should be adjusted, hence an RSocket-Application is always a reactive webapplication or if the Condition for ReactiveUserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration needs to be adjusted to work on webapps and non webapps.
What do you think @mhalbritter @philwebb ?

@mhalbritter
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm yeah, I think we can't do that then. I overlooked the fact that RSocket is also supported by Spring Security. @bclozel WDYT?

@mhalbritter mhalbritter added the status: on-hold We can't start working on this issue yet label Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: on-hold We can't start working on this issue yet type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants