Skip to content

Take MethodType into account to deduce main application class #31828

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

quaff
Copy link
Contributor

@quaff quaff commented Jul 21, 2022

No description provided.

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Jul 21, 2022
@philwebb
Copy link
Member

See #31701

@philwebb philwebb added type: bug A general bug and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Jul 21, 2022
@philwebb philwebb added this to the 3.0.x milestone Jul 21, 2022
@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

wilkinsona commented Jul 21, 2022

I don't think this is a bug. The code that was contributed in #31701 is equivalent to what we had before. This suggestion improves things in a way that wasn't possible before.

@wilkinsona wilkinsona added type: task A general task and removed type: bug A general bug labels Jul 21, 2022
@quaff
Copy link
Contributor Author

quaff commented Jul 22, 2022

I don't think this is a bug. The code that was contributed in #31701 is equivalent to what we had before. This suggestion improves things in a way that wasn't possible before.

Yes, It's just an improvement.

@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

Thanks very much, @quaff.

@snicoll
Copy link
Member

snicoll commented Jul 25, 2022

This change breaks in native image, I've created #31858

@snicoll snicoll added the status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply label Jul 25, 2022
@snicoll snicoll removed this from the 3.0.0-M5 milestone Jul 25, 2022
@snicoll
Copy link
Member

snicoll commented Jul 25, 2022

For the reason above, I've reverted this change. We can follow-up in #31858

snicoll added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply type: task A general task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants