Replies: 1 comment
-
That's a good idea. I like the implementation, it's quite generic. However, wouldn't be the goal of having a class for builtins to expose a fixed list of builtins? (e.g., save, load, ...), so that these functions have a nice signature and description, and users know they can use them? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Should we expose a slightly nicer way of calling non-spm functions?
I've been using this in some of my code:
And, related, I use this helper to save variables in a mat file:
which we could implement somewhere in
__wrapper__
, since it's quite commonly used. Or maybe I should just use?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions