Skip to content

Issues: spine-tools/SpineOpt.jl

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
8 Open 10 Closed
8 Open 10 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Cover more combinations of functionality in the tests Type: improvement Improve something that already exists Zone: testing & validation Check code & outputs match what's expected
#1084 opened Sep 3, 2024 by DillonJ
Improve CodeCov & add to PR checklist good first issue Good for newcomers Type: improvement Improve something that already exists Zone: testing & validation Check code & outputs match what's expected
#860 opened Jan 24, 2024 by clizbe
6
Review industry model(s) documentation to determine missing features Type: research Results in an answer/decision, rather than code Zone: testing & validation Check code & outputs match what's expected
#847 opened Jan 12, 2024 by clizbe
1
Add unit-test for boundary flows Type: new feature Add something that doesn't exist yet Zone: testing & validation Check code & outputs match what's expected
#818 opened Dec 7, 2023 by manuelma
Test with a real systems and workflows in the new 0.8 SpineToolbox version using latest version of SpineOpt Type: new feature Add something that doesn't exist yet Zone: integration & updates How to always play nice with others (Toolbox, Julia, etc) Zone: testing & validation Check code & outputs match what's expected
#810 opened Nov 28, 2023 by datejada
1
Use JuMP.fix_discrete_variables to calculate duals (fallback) Type: research Results in an answer/decision, rather than code Zone: testing & validation Check code & outputs match what's expected
#703 opened Jul 10, 2023 by manuelma
@manuelma
3
rolling forward with different temporal structure does not work Type: bug Something isn't working as expected Zone: testing & validation Check code & outputs match what's expected
#633 opened Apr 23, 2023 by nnhjy TB 0.7
1
process_network doesn't account for more than one commodity having the lodf or ptdf physics Type: bug Something isn't working as expected Zone: documentation Explanation of code, tutorials Zone: testing & validation Check code & outputs match what's expected
#165 opened Feb 7, 2021 by spine-o-bot Roadmap
@manuelma
4
ProTip! Exclude everything labeled bug with -label:bug.