You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The "split" instruction is limited to only new stake accounts as the destination. This requires some amount of rent-exempt SOL to be kept around if a client is doing a lot of splitting. Additionally, if someone only has stake authority, and they want to move active delegations around, they must provide the rent-exemption for the split destination.
Proposed solution
Going along with #3, also allow splits to go into inactive stake accounts. The main question: should we force the destination stake account to have the same permissions as the source account?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem
The "split" instruction is limited to only new stake accounts as the destination. This requires some amount of rent-exempt SOL to be kept around if a client is doing a lot of splitting. Additionally, if someone only has stake authority, and they want to move active delegations around, they must provide the rent-exemption for the split destination.
Proposed solution
Going along with #3, also allow splits to go into inactive stake accounts. The main question: should we force the destination stake account to have the same permissions as the source account?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: