This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 11, 2025. It is now read-only.
[token-client] Make close_context_state_account
and close_record_account
variable order consistent
#7174
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
There is an inconsistency in the parameter orders between the
confidential_transfer_close_context_state
andconfidential_transfer_close_record_account
functions.confidential_transfer_close_context_state
, the lamport destination account is before the context state authorityconfidential_transfer_close_record_account
, the lamport destination comes after the context state authoritySummary of Changes
I updated
confidential_transfer_close_record_account
function to follow theconfidential_transfer_close_context_state
function. I also updated theconfidential_transfer_close_context_state
function name toconfidential_transfer_close_context_state_account
to be more consistent with the other functions.