Remove sttpClientTag

[wi101]

Resolves #2311

Add a type ZioWebSocketsStreams to help capturing the type tag of ZioStreams with WebSockets here

Before submitting pull request:

• Check if the project compiles by running sbt compile
• Verify docs compilation by running sbt compileDocs
• Check if tests pass by running sbt test
• Format code by running sbt scalafmt

[adamw]

Thanks for fixing my ugly hack :) I was wondering if it's going to break anything, thought the tests passed ... ;)

[wi101]

@adamw the way how it didn't compile even without the type alias is questionable, I am still trying to understand the reason that caused the compiler to not find the sttpClientTag when it didn't use the type alias, this might be related to a confusion between dependencies
this is the error

 -- [E172] Type Error: tak/sttp/effects/zio/src/main/scalajvm/sttp/client3/httpclient/zio/package.scala:34:51 
[error] 34 |    ZIO.serviceWithZIO[SttpClient](_.send(request))
[error]    |                                                   ^
[error]    |could not find implicit value for izumi.reflect.Tag[sttp.client3.httpclient.zio.SttpClient]. Did you forget to put on a Tag, TagK or TagKK context bound on one of the parameters in sttp.client3.httpclient.zio.SttpClient? e.g. def x[T: Tag, F[_]: TagK] = ....
[error]    |I found:
[error]    |
[error]    |    zio².Tag.materialize[
[error]    |      
[error]    |        sttp.client3.SttpBackend[zio².Task, sttp.capabilities.zio³.ZioStreams &
[error]    |          sttp.capabilities.WebSockets]
[error]    |      
[error]    |    ]
[error]    |
[error]    |But method materialize in trait TagVersionSpecific does not match type zio².Tag[sttp.client3.httpclient.zio.SttpClient]
[error]    |
[error]    |where:    zio  is a package in package sttp.client3.httpclient
[error]    |          zio² is a package
[error]    |          zio³ is a package in package sttp.capabilities

it looks like it required izumi.reflect.Tag and found zio.Tag 🤔

[adamw]

Yeah this was some problem in ZIO ... which I can't find right now ;)