Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ks 316 replace secret usage in transmission protocol with the workflow execution #13501

Conversation

ettec
Copy link
Collaborator

@ettec ettec commented Jun 11, 2024

No description provided.

@ettec ettec force-pushed the KS-316-Replace-secret-usage-in-transmission-protocol-with-the-workflow-execution-id branch from b12cb7d to 4fdcaee Compare June 11, 2024 14:53
@ettec ettec force-pushed the KS-316-Replace-secret-usage-in-transmission-protocol-with-the-workflow-execution-id branch from 4fdcaee to a1e48cc Compare June 11, 2024 14:55
@ettec ettec requested review from bolekk and DeividasK June 11, 2024 15:20
krehermann
krehermann previously approved these changes Jun 11, 2024
@ettec ettec dismissed stale reviews from krehermann and cedric-cordenier via ba31f30 June 11, 2024 15:28
@ettec ettec force-pushed the KS-316-Replace-secret-usage-in-transmission-protocol-with-the-workflow-execution-id branch from 0f62246 to 1644c6a Compare June 11, 2024 16:53
@ettec ettec force-pushed the KS-316-Replace-secret-usage-in-transmission-protocol-with-the-workflow-execution-id branch from 1644c6a to ac77029 Compare June 11, 2024 16:53
@ettec ettec enabled auto-merge June 11, 2024 17:03
@krehermann krehermann self-requested a review June 11, 2024 17:13
@ettec ettec added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 15f02f6 Jun 11, 2024
106 checks passed
@ettec ettec deleted the KS-316-Replace-secret-usage-in-transmission-protocol-with-the-workflow-execution-id branch June 11, 2024 17:48
return nil, errors.New("workflow ID and workflow execution ID must be set in request metadata")
}

transmissionID := req.Metadata.WorkflowID + req.Metadata.WorkflowExecutionID
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

WorkflowExecutionID = WorkflowID + EventID, so adding WorkflowID again seems redundant?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ettec ettec Jun 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agree, thats not necessary, no material impact I think? I'll get on to it shortly

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants