You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You estimate that TV has an ROAS of 11.04: a $1 increase in TV adspend increases sales by $11. In percentage terms this is a 1004% return, which is incredibly high; in the stock market, 10% is a good return.
Do you think this is reasonable? How do you correct for selection bias and reverse causation? What's your statistical power to detect smaller effects like 10% (or ROAS = 1.1)?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
You estimate that TV has an ROAS of 11.04: a $1 increase in TV adspend increases sales by $11. In percentage terms this is a 1004% return, which is incredibly high; in the stock market, 10% is a good return.
Do you think this is reasonable? How do you correct for selection bias and reverse causation? What's your statistical power to detect smaller effects like 10% (or ROAS = 1.1)?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions