Include/exclude MP(2)RAGE results?

[dpapp86]

I'm starting this discussion here as it will require some data upload/deletion/coding to sort out.

As far as I am concerned, the two main results are the B1+ maps and the B1+ distribution along the SC ("we said we can shim, and indeed, we can"), and the CSF/SC signal ration in the GRE scans ("we said we can shim and this is the effect").

Originally, we added the MP1RAGE scans to show the effect on a more "clinically relevant" scan type.

Then you had a good comment on how the MP2RAGE figure from Gaspard looks much nicer.

So I see three ways forward:

1, We only show the results on B1+ maps and the GRE

2, We show that plus the MPRAGE scans.
Pro: we can do stats on it, as we have five subjects
Con: the results are not as "popping"

3, We show the MP2RAGE scan
Pro: quite impressive results
Con: arrived at using a different workflow, might conflict with the paper's messaging

@jcohenadad what is your opinion?

[jcohenadad]

I'd go with "1" for the first submission and keep the MP2RAGE in the fridge to feed reviewers with additional food if they are hungry.

[dpapp86]

Agreed.

[jcohenadad]

For the record, we're talking about subject ACDC_026