Fix Prettier formatting in WARP.md

[justin808]

Summary

• Fixed Prettier formatting issues in WARP.md by adding blank lines after headers

Details

Prettier requires blank lines after markdown headers for consistent formatting. This change adds those blank lines throughout the file to ensure it passes formatting checks.

Test plan

• ✅ Ran yarn start format to auto-fix formatting
• ✅ Verified formatting with yarn start format.listDifferent
• ✅ Pre-commit hooks passed (Prettier, ESLint, RuboCop, trailing newlines)
• ✅ Pre-push hooks passed

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

---

This change is 

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Substantially expanded development documentation with comprehensive setup, testing, development server, and linting guidance for developers.
  • Enhanced architecture overview and data flow documentation with detailed component breakdowns and workflow details.
  • Improved troubleshooting, development workflows, and generator testing sections with extensive practical examples.
  • Added IDE configuration, formatting rules, and development constraints documentation for monorepo considerations and best practices.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The WARP.md documentation file is expanded with substantial new content across multiple sections including Setup, Testing, Linting, Building, Development Server, Architecture Overview, Data Flow, Development Workflows, and Troubleshooting. This augmentation adds numerous bullet points, examples, and detailed guidance without modifying executable code.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)

Summary

Documentation Expansion WARP.md

Adds extensive new content and blank lines across multiple sections: Setup, Testing, Linting & Formatting, Building, Development Server, Local Testing with Yalc, Architecture Overview, Data Flow, Common Development Workflows, Testing Generator Changes, Formatting Rules, IDE Configuration, Important Constraints, Troubleshooting, and Monorepo Merger. Includes additional bullet points, examples, workflow guidance, and explicit project constraints.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

• Review focuses on consistency and clarity of documentation additions
• Verify accuracy of setup instructions, testing commands, and workflow guidance
• Check for completeness of constraints and troubleshooting sections

Suggested reviewers

• AbanoubGhadban
• alexeyr-ci2

Poem

🐰 Hops through docs with careful stride,
WARP now blooms with guides so wide,
Setup, test, and build so clear,
Workflows guide us far and near,
Knowledge squared, we celebrate! 📚✨

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch justin808/fix-warp-md-lint

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2dfb15 and 5ed2c6f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• WARP.md (17 hunks)

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[claude]

PR Review: Fix Prettier formatting in WARP.md

✅ Overall Assessment

This is a clean, straightforward formatting fix that properly addresses Prettier requirements. The changes are minimal, focused, and follow the project's strict formatting guidelines outlined in CLAUDE.md.

---

Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

• ✅ Changes are purely cosmetic and follow Prettier's markdown formatting rules
• ✅ Adds blank lines after markdown headers as required by Prettier
• ✅ No logic changes - zero risk of introducing bugs
• ✅ Follows the project's mandatory workflow: used automated tools (rake autofix, yarn start format) rather than manual formatting
• ✅ Consistent formatting throughout the entire file (33 additions across all sections)

Observations:

• The changes demonstrate proper adherence to the project's critical rule: "Prettier is the SOLE authority for formatting non-Ruby files. NEVER manually format code."
• All modifications are blank line additions after headers - a standard Prettier markdown requirement

---

Potential Issues

None identified. This is a textbook example of a formatting-only change with zero risk.

---

Performance Considerations

N/A - Documentation changes have no runtime performance impact.

---

Security Concerns

None. No security implications for formatting changes in documentation files.

---

Test Coverage

Test Plan Verification:

• ✅ Ran yarn start format for auto-fix
• ✅ Verified with yarn start format.listDifferent
• ✅ Pre-commit hooks passed (Prettier, ESLint, RuboCop, trailing newlines)
• ✅ Pre-push hooks passed

Assessment: Test plan is appropriate and sufficient. For a formatting-only change in a markdown file, the validation steps are exactly what's needed. No additional tests required.

---

Adherence to Project Conventions

Excellent adherence to CLAUDE.md requirements:

✅ Used automated formatting tools (not manual)
✅ Verified with yarn start format.listDifferent
✅ Followed the standard workflow from CLAUDE.md
✅ No manual formatting applied
✅ Pre-commit hooks validated the changes

Per CLAUDE.md Section "⚠️ FORMATTING RULES":

"Prettier is the SOLE authority for formatting non-Ruby files, and RuboCop for formatting Ruby files. NEVER manually format code."

This PR exemplifies the correct approach.

---

Recommendations

1. LGTM - Ready to merge ✅

   • All changes are automated formatting fixes
   • Zero risk of bugs or regressions
   • Follows project conventions perfectly

2. Optional Documentation Consideration (for future):

   • Consider adding a pre-commit hook check specifically for markdown files to catch these issues before PR creation
   • However, I note the project already has comprehensive hooks in .lefthook.yml, so this may already be addressed

3. Changelog Update (verify if needed):

   • Per CLAUDE.md: "Update CHANGELOG.md for user-visible changes only"
   • This change does NOT require a changelog entry - it's purely a formatting fix with no user impact

---

Summary

Recommendation: APPROVE & MERGE

This PR is exactly what a formatting fix should be:

• Minimal, focused changes
• Automated tool-driven (not manual)
• Zero risk
• Properly validated

Great work following the project's strict formatting discipline! 🎯

---

Review generated with assistance from Claude Code