Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] Containerizing #106

Closed
rockaut opened this issue Apr 11, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

[Request] Containerizing #106

rockaut opened this issue Apr 11, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@rockaut
Copy link

rockaut commented Apr 11, 2017

Hello there,

have you thought of trying to containerize your app (not just put it in one container, do it right and split the workload)? If not, would you mind if i fork and try it?

I like your solution but in the last months we use containers more and more and from our experience it work extremely well. Especially as it would be easily possible to deploy sexigraf to baremetal as well.

Best regards

@rschitz rschitz added this to the 0.99e - White Forest milestone Jun 6, 2017
@rschitz rschitz removed this from the 0.99e - White Forest milestone Jul 10, 2018
@rschitz
Copy link
Member

rschitz commented Feb 26, 2020

@rschitz rschitz closed this as completed Feb 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants