Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 9, 2024. It is now read-only.

Adding support for nodejs16 and nodejs18 #642

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Feb 27, 2023
Merged

Adding support for nodejs16 and nodejs18 #642

merged 13 commits into from
Feb 27, 2023

Conversation

gligorkot
Copy link
Contributor

What did you implement:

Adding support for Nodejs 18

How did you implement it:

Following a template that others have followed

How can we verify it:

Use it to deploy a nodejs18 function app to Azure.

Todos:

Note: Run npm run test:ci to run all validation checks on proposed changes

  • Ensure there are no lint errors.
    Validate via npm run lint
    Note: Some reported issues can be automatically fixed by running npm run lint:fix
  • Write tests and confirm existing functionality is not broken.
    Validate via npm test
  • Write documentation
  • Provide verification config / commands / resources
  • Enable "Allow edits from maintainers" for this PR
  • Update the messages below

Is this ready for review?: YES
Is it a breaking change?: NO

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ describe("Function App Resource", () => {
const config = getConfig(FunctionAppOS.LINUX, Runtime.PYTHON36);

const resource = new FunctionAppResource();

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's not introduce unrelated changes

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
"requires": true,
"packages": {
"": {
"version": "2.1.0",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's not introduce changes to this file

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@gligorkot gligorkot requested a review from medikoo February 24, 2023 20:20
@gligorkot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@medikoo this is now updated and ready for re-review

Copy link
Contributor

@medikoo medikoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you 👍

@medikoo medikoo merged commit b48513b into serverless:master Feb 27, 2023
@gligorkot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@medikoo any chance we can get a new release tagged for these changes you've just merged please? 🙏

@medikoo
Copy link
Contributor

medikoo commented Feb 28, 2023

@gligorkot Currently validating this repository is broken, and i think we should fix it before pursuing any release.

I've created an issue describing what needs to be done: #645

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants