Update issue1188-changes-to-agreement-commitment-and-obligation.md

Author: pppelll

docs/release_notes/issue1188-changes-to-agreement-commitment-and-obligation.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ### Major Updates
 
-- Changes to `gist:Commitment`, `gist:Agreement`, `gist:ContingentObligation` and removal of `gist:Obligation`. Issue [#1188](https://github.com/semanticarts/gist/issues/1188).
+- Changes to `gist:Commitment`, `gist:Agreement`, and removal of `gist:Obligation`. Issue [#1188](https://github.com/semanticarts/gist/issues/1188).
   - Deleted class `gist:Obligation`.
   - Changed the definition of `gist:Agreement` to no longer reference `gist:Obligation`. 
   - `gist:Agreement` is no longer a subclass of `gist:Commitment`. 
@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@
 - Changes to `gist:Commitment`, `gist:Agreement`, and removal of `gist:Obligation`. Issue [#1188](https://github.com/semanticarts/gist/issues/1188).
   - Added `skos:scopeNote` to `gist:Commitment` which makes clear the unilateral-ness of the new definition. 
   - Added `skos:scopeNote` to `gist:Agreement` which emphasizes that it is not necessary to instantiate every single commitment which makes up an agreement.
-  - Added `skos:scopeNote` to `gist:Commitment` which clarifies that commitments might be binding via legal, moral, contractual, or other kinds of deontic force.
+  - Added `skos:scopeNote` to `gist:Commitment` which clarifies that commitments might be binding via legal, moral, contractual, or other kinds of deontic force.