Does it exist? (crowd sourced Wish List)

[zacharywhitley]

Is it not on the list? Do you wish that it was? Well add it here and myself or someone else might just go find it. If we can't find it than it's a good candidate for something to go and create.

Sometimes wishes really do come true!

[maximveksler]

I'm missing an interactive introduction to RDF going from triplet to Datalog that can act as killer demo for new people to grasp possibilities.

[maximveksler]

curriculum for graph theory, rdf, modelling. Real life example of walk throughs of modeling, semantic meaning, explained with lessons learned and co.

[zacharywhitley]

Interesting. Lets start another ancillary page on example-curricula.md and we can expand on the education/how-to/books section while we're at it. I wonder if there are any existing curricula we can use as a template.

• https://www.sti-innsbruck.at/teaching/curriculum/semantic-web
• https://www.phusewiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Semantic_Technology_Curriculum
• https://www3.cs.stonybrook.edu/~pfodor/courses/CSE595/syllabus.html
• https://www.cs.unb.ca/~boley/cs6795swt/syllabus.html
• https://cs.hofstra.edu/~knarig/SemanticWeb/

[zacharywhitley]

"Does it exist" is a better title but I still wanted something to capture "I know it doesn't exist but wish it did" as an alternative to some of the stuff listed at EasierRDF, maybe "It doesn't exist....but I wish it did."

[maximveksler]

Updated the title.

n.b. https://github.com/w3c/EasierRDF seem like a wonderful resource. If I may ask - how did you hear about that?

[maximveksler]

n.b. II - a better format then a single issue might be a forum for discussion on a "per wish", could a forum on https://discuss.graph.vodka be valid option?

We could put a header on the awesome README.md list inviting people to participate and contribute.

[zacharywhitley]

EasierRDF seems to be a mixed bag. There seem to be some good intensions that are unfortunately mixed up with some misunderstandings. I'm sympathetic to the "lets make this easier to use" but don't like the "lets make this easier for me to use by getting rid of the parts I don't understand"

[pfodor]

These are the slides for the materials in my syllabus linked above:
https://www3.cs.stonybrook.edu/~pfodor/courses/cse595.html
If you need the powerpoint lectures, then I am happy to provide them.
I keep the homework assignments in Blackboard as requested by my university, but I can send them by email if requested: pfodor at cs dot stonybrook dot edu

[rkranendonk]

I'm looking for an ontology that describes business processes. You already listed the W3C 'org' ontology but that's limited to the structure of the organization.

[rkranendonk]

Also looking for an ISO27001 / 27002 ontology.

[zacharywhitley]

It looks like your looking for more of a cyber ontology rather than a bussiness organization ontology (I can see w3c org being used in a iso27001 mapping.

I've actually started a separate awesome list specifically for ontologies at https://github.com/semantalytics/awesome-ontologies

It's just getting started to it needs some work. There are several papers by a Stephan Fenz on creating an ontology based on ISO27001. Unfortunately the link to the ontology is dead. It looks like they were running webprotege.