Incorporate context.Context into SourceManager

[sdboyer]

We need to start using context.Context for handling cancellation-type behaviors within the SourceManager. There are two parts to this:

• A context.Context should be passed to NewSourceManager(), and the cancellation channel there used to replace the exposed signal handling system. (It's still fine to have a helper func that sets up a Context for this purpose, though.)
• SourceManager methods that touch disk or network - so, pretty much all of them - also need to take a context.Context, so that the caller has the option of controlling timeouts or forcing terminations.

There's no way this is feasible without a wider refactor of *SourceMgr to use channel-based brokers for all its activity, but that's fine - that absolutely needs to happen anyway. We can do all of that at the same time.

re: golang/dep#160

[erizocosmico]

I can tackle this if it's okay with you 😄

[sdboyer]

Oh man, that'd be...amazing. 🎉 😄 🎉 But, the refactor here is likely to amount to a rewrite of significant portions of the SourceManager system. It's daunting enough that I'm worried about it turning into one of those dangerous, neverendering refactors...and I wrote the damn thing.

Don't get me wrong - I REALLY want other people to take ownership over parts of gps. (So, SO much). But this might not be the best place to start, as fully accomplishing it is likely to be the final step in a series of changes, including #84, #130, #150, and half a dozen more I haven't even had time to write up yet.

#84 is probably most directly related to this, but is more narrowly focused, and wouldn't be as affected by this bigger refactor I'm picturing. Maybe you could start by looking at that?

[erizocosmico]

Yeah, totally, I'll start with #84. I've been taking a look at SourceMgr's code and you're right, it's a big daunting for a first time working on this codebase.

[sdboyer]

(I'm now working on this in #196)

[fabulous-gopher]

This issue was moved to golang/dep#423