Skip to content

Conversation

@tassiluca
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 21, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 81.81818% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (master@bfba40b). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...bo/scafi/context/xc/ExchangeAggregateContext.scala 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...scala/it/unibo/scafi/libraries/CommonLibrary.scala 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #221   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   61.91%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       58           
  Lines             ?      730           
  Branches          ?       59           
=========================================
  Hits              ?      452           
  Misses            ?      278           
  Partials          ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

import org.scalatest.matchers.should

class ExportTest extends AnyFlatSpecLike, should.Matchers:
private given Conversion[String, InvocationCoordinate] = key => InvocationCoordinate(key, invocationCount = 0)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this implicit be refactored into a single implementation somewhere? It is used twice in the tests.
Does it make sense?

@nicolasfara nicolasfara force-pushed the refactor/path branch 4 times, most recently from 5079244 to b6f58f2 Compare January 4, 2026 01:19
@nicolasfara nicolasfara force-pushed the refactor/path branch 2 times, most recently from e53ebd1 to 648e10e Compare January 7, 2026 22:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants