-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Linux aarch64 releases #3056
Comments
Who can provide CI infrastructure for both? |
Sounds like M1 support is coming to GitHub actions soon. That should give us some arm coverage. |
Renaming this, since we're already tracking Apple in #3033 |
Just found this issue because I also need node-sass for Linux ARM64. |
Alternatively you can use https://cirun.io, which helps you create self-hosted GitHub Actions on cloud (with aarch64 support). |
Hi @nschonni, I have seen your comment in ticket #3033, stating that “ Instead of waiting for GitHub Actions officially supporting ARM64, there is another option “
https://github.com/WorksOnArm/equinix-metal-arm64-cluster This is for access to Arm-based HW. The actual maintenance of the build systems deployed on the Arm cluster would still need to be done by the project. May I know, are you interested in “ |
Hi Team, May I know your thoughts about "WorksOnArm"? |
Would it be possible to provide not just x64, but aarch64 releases for Mac & Linux, or Windows too if you can, but that at least I'm not invested in.
Mac will be all aarch64 from now on, and many providers, including some of the big cloud providers have aarch64 server offerings, like AWS Graviton (in second iteration no less). Even if no arm build environment exists, docker buildx makes it possible to do so on x64 build nodes as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: