Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[supernova] UI bug in Scheduled Silences >>> DatePicker #610

Open
TilmanHaupt opened this issue May 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[supernova] UI bug in Scheduled Silences >>> DatePicker #610

TilmanHaupt opened this issue May 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@TilmanHaupt
Copy link
Contributor

TilmanHaupt commented May 27, 2024

The DatePicker has a problem in the Scheduled Silence Modal inside greenhouse. The DatePicker opens outside the shown parts of the Modal so you need to scroll to the right. This just happens if the modal get very small. I dont know how to solve the issue. Thanks. 👍

Image
Image
Image

@TilmanHaupt TilmanHaupt added the bug Something isn't working label May 27, 2024
@TilmanHaupt TilmanHaupt changed the title [supernova] UI bug in Scheduled Silences [supernova] UI bug in Scheduled Silences >>> DatePicker May 27, 2024
@edda
Copy link
Collaborator

edda commented May 30, 2024

@TilmanHaupt can you try to change this that instead of having two separate datepicker instances to use one with the range feature?

@TilmanHaupt
Copy link
Contributor Author

TilmanHaupt commented Jun 6, 2024

The Layout of the range mode makes it not possible for me to define a start and endtime. Just the endtime is flexible in this case. Also in terms of understanding the UI I am in favor to split this information up in 2 DateTimePicker. So even if you would have the possibility of setting both dates with a time it would be a IMO a confusing interface

Image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants