-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
.Net Core version #100
Comments
hello TheSchemm, I think it should be possible. Will try to do it but can't promise anything about exact dates. Meanwhile you may fork repository and build own instance against .Net Core. Added it to future improvements page: https://github.com/sadomovalex/camlex/wiki/Future-improvements. |
Awesome! Thanks for the quick response. I just thought too, that you might be able target .Net Standard 2.0 and which would tackle all .Net Core, .Net and .Net 5 |
Ok, .Net Standard 2.0 also may be considered for sure. |
@TheSchemm I checked possibility to target .Net Standard 2.0 in Camlex.Client (I assume that you meant exactly client version because basic server object model version for on-prem is mostly for farm solutions which work on SP farm and of course use .Net Framework). For now I don't see big need to retarget Camlex.CLient to .Net Standard 2.0 because of 2 main reasons:
I've tried to reference Camlex.Client from .Net Standard 2.0 app and it worked i.e. queries were successfully created from C# code. There was this warning but it is not critical since code is actually working:
I.e. if we will reference .Net Standard 2.0 we won't be able to compile Camlex.Client for on-prem anymore which is quite important still. |
@TheSchemm At the end technical problems have been resolved. Camlex.Client 5.0 with native support for .NET 5.0 and .NET Standard 2.0 has been released: https://sadomovalex.blogspot.com/2021/08/camlexclient-50-released-support-for.html. Thank you for your idea and patience:) |
Would it be possible to build and publish binaries for .net core in your nuget package as well?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: