Skip to content

Conversation

@djc
Copy link
Member

@djc djc commented Apr 22, 2025

@djc djc requested review from cpu and est31 April 22, 2025 13:07
Base automatically changed from issuer to main April 23, 2025 14:15
@djc djc marked this pull request as draft April 25, 2025 13:46
}
}

trait ToDer {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as I've said previously, I'd prefer a better name for that trait: SignDer or something like it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup. Do you think the introduction of the trait carries its weight here? I'm not totally convinced...

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not really tbh. I think having consistent inherent functions is better (traits need to be imported to be used/called, and even if you add inherent functions on top, they still add complexity, which needs to be justified, and in this case i think it's not).

@cpu
Copy link
Member

cpu commented Apr 28, 2025

djc marked this pull request as draft 3 days ago

Did you want me to hold off reviewing this for now?

@djc
Copy link
Member Author

djc commented Apr 28, 2025

djc marked this pull request as draft 3 days ago

Did you want me to hold off reviewing this for now?

Yup!

@djc djc closed this Jun 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants