Skip to content

Commit 8324d12

Browse files
committed
Update RFC, MCP, FCP and CFT sections for TWiR-602
1 parent e2b47c9 commit 8324d12

File tree

1 file changed

+39
-50
lines changed

1 file changed

+39
-50
lines changed

draft/2025-06-04-this-week-in-rust.md

Lines changed: 39 additions & 50 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -57,29 +57,18 @@ and just ask the editors to select the category.
5757
[submit_crate]: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704
5858

5959
## Calls for Testing
60-
6160
An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
62-
implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization. The following
63-
RFCs would benefit from user testing before moving forward:
64-
65-
<!-- Calls for Testing go here, use this format:
66-
* [<RFC Topic>](<RFC URL>)
67-
* [Tracking Issue](<Tracking Issue URL>)
68-
* [Testing steps](<Testing Steps URL>)
69-
-->
70-
<!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
71-
<!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
72-
<!-- Remember to remove the `call-for-testing` label from the RFC so that the maintainer can signal for testers again, if desired. -->
73-
74-
### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing)
61+
implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization.
7562

76-
### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing)
63+
If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear in this list, add a
64+
`call-for-testing` label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or
65+
guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature need testing.
7766

78-
### [Rustup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing)
67+
* *No calls for testing were issued this week by [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing),
68+
[Rust language RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing) or
69+
[Rustup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing).*
7970

80-
If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear on the above list, add the new `call-for-testing`
81-
label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature
82-
need testing.
71+
[Let us know](https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust/issues) if you would like your feature to be tracked as a part of this list.
8372

8473
## Call for Participation; projects and speakers
8574

@@ -120,47 +109,47 @@ If you are an event organizer hoping to expand the reach of your event, please s
120109
Changes to Rust follow the Rust [RFC (request for comments) process](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs). These
121110
are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:
122111

123-
<!-- Approved RFCs go here, use this format: * [Topic](URL) -->
124-
<!-- or if none were approved this week, use: * *No RFCs were approved this week.* -->
125-
<!-- * []() -->
126-
127-
<!--
128-
### [Approved Major Change Proposals (MCP)](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html)
129-
<!~~ MCPs occur infrequently, so this section is commented out by default. ~~>
130-
<!~~ MCPs which have been approved or rejected this week go here, use this format: * [major change accepted|rejected] [Topic](URL) ~~>
131-
-->
112+
* *No RFCs were approved this week.*
132113

133114
### Final Comment Period
134115

135116
Every week, [the team](https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html) announces the 'final comment period' for RFCs and key PRs
136117
which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.
137118

138-
#### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period)
139-
<!-- RFCs which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
140-
<!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: * *No RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
141-
<!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
142-
143119
#### Tracking Issues & PRs
144-
<!-- Tracking Issues which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
145-
<!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: -->
146-
<!-- * *No Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
147-
<!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
148-
149120
##### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
150-
151-
##### [Cargo](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
152-
153-
##### [Language Team](https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+)
154-
155-
##### [Language Reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
156-
157-
##### [Unsafe Code Guidelines](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
121+
* [Add (back) unsupported_calling_conventions lint to reject more invalid calling conventions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141435)
122+
* [Stabilize `if let` guards (`feature(if_let_guard)`)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141295)
123+
* [Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138016)
124+
* [Make the `dangerous_implicit_autorefs` lint deny-by-default](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141661)
125+
* [Make NonZero<char> possible](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141001)
126+
* [Tracking Issue for nonnull_provenance](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135243)
127+
* [disposition: close] [Implement operations for Wrapping<T> where Rhs = T](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140567)
128+
* [Split up the `unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes` lint](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140717)
129+
* [Lint on fn pointers comparisons in external macros](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134536)
130+
* [Specify the behavior of `file!`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134442)
131+
* [Document representation of `Option<unsafe fn()>`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141447)
132+
* [Stabilize `feature(generic_arg_infer)`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141610)
133+
* [Allow `#![doc(test(attr(..)))]` everywhere](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140560)
134+
* [Tracking Issue for File lock API](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130994)
135+
* [disposition: unspecified] [Tracking Issue for `unsigned_signed_diff`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126041)
136+
* [Stabilise `os_string_pathbuf_leak`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137992)
137+
138+
##### [Rust RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period)
139+
* [[RFC] Add `#[export_ordinal(n)]` attribute](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3641)
140+
141+
*No Items entered Final Comment Period this week for
142+
[Cargo](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc),
143+
[Language Reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc),
144+
[Language Team](https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+) or
145+
[Unsafe Code Guidelines](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc).*
146+
147+
Let us know if you would like your PRs, Tracking Issues or RFCs to be tracked as a part of this list.
158148

159149
#### [New and Updated RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls)
160-
<!-- New or updated RFCs go here, use this format: * [new|updated] [Topic](URL) -->
161-
<!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
162-
<!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
163-
<!-- * [new|updated] []() -->
150+
* [new] [de-RFC: Remove unsized_locals](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3829)
151+
* [new] [RFC: Procedural macros in same package as app](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3826)
152+
* [new] [RFC: Allow generic impls using local trait bounds](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3821)
164153

165154
## Upcoming Events
166155

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)