Skip to content

Commit 49afe7b

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #6704 from U007D/master
Update RFC, MCP, FCP and CFT sections for TWiR-602
2 parents b62b8d8 + c03c16d commit 49afe7b

File tree

1 file changed

+39
-50
lines changed

1 file changed

+39
-50
lines changed

draft/2025-06-04-this-week-in-rust.md

Lines changed: 39 additions & 50 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -65,29 +65,18 @@ and just ask the editors to select the category.
6565
[submit_crate]: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704
6666

6767
## Calls for Testing
68-
6968
An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
70-
implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization. The following
71-
RFCs would benefit from user testing before moving forward:
72-
73-
<!-- Calls for Testing go here, use this format:
74-
* [<RFC Topic>](<RFC URL>)
75-
* [Tracking Issue](<Tracking Issue URL>)
76-
* [Testing steps](<Testing Steps URL>)
77-
-->
78-
<!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
79-
<!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
80-
<!-- Remember to remove the `call-for-testing` label from the RFC so that the maintainer can signal for testers again, if desired. -->
81-
82-
### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing)
69+
implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization.
8370

84-
### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing)
71+
If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear in this list, add a
72+
`call-for-testing` label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or
73+
guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature need testing.
8574

86-
### [Rustup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing)
75+
* *No calls for testing were issued this week by [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing),
76+
[Rust language RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing) or
77+
[Rustup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing).*
8778

88-
If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear on the above list, add the new `call-for-testing`
89-
label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature
90-
need testing.
79+
[Let us know](https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust/issues) if you would like your feature to be tracked as a part of this list.
9180

9281
## Call for Participation; projects and speakers
9382

@@ -135,47 +124,47 @@ Revision range: [2805e1dc..2fc3deed](https://perf.rust-lang.org/?start=2805e1dc4
135124
Changes to Rust follow the Rust [RFC (request for comments) process](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs). These
136125
are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:
137126

138-
<!-- Approved RFCs go here, use this format: * [Topic](URL) -->
139-
<!-- or if none were approved this week, use: * *No RFCs were approved this week.* -->
140-
<!-- * []() -->
141-
142-
<!--
143-
### [Approved Major Change Proposals (MCP)](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html)
144-
<!~~ MCPs occur infrequently, so this section is commented out by default. ~~>
145-
<!~~ MCPs which have been approved or rejected this week go here, use this format: * [major change accepted|rejected] [Topic](URL) ~~>
146-
-->
127+
* *No RFCs were approved this week.*
147128

148129
### Final Comment Period
149130

150131
Every week, [the team](https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html) announces the 'final comment period' for RFCs and key PRs
151132
which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.
152133

153-
#### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period)
154-
<!-- RFCs which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
155-
<!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: * *No RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
156-
<!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
157-
158134
#### Tracking Issues & PRs
159-
<!-- Tracking Issues which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
160-
<!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: -->
161-
<!-- * *No Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
162-
<!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
163-
164135
##### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
165-
166-
##### [Cargo](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
167-
168-
##### [Language Team](https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+)
169-
170-
##### [Language Reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
171-
172-
##### [Unsafe Code Guidelines](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
136+
* [Add (back) unsupported_calling_conventions lint to reject more invalid calling conventions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141435)
137+
* [Stabilize `if let` guards (`feature(if_let_guard)`)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141295)
138+
* [Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138016)
139+
* [Make the `dangerous_implicit_autorefs` lint deny-by-default](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141661)
140+
* [Make NonZero< char > possible](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141001)
141+
* [Tracking Issue for nonnull_provenance](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135243)
142+
* [disposition: close] [Implement operations for Wrapping< T > where Rhs = T](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140567)
143+
* [Split up the `unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes` lint](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140717)
144+
* [Lint on fn pointers comparisons in external macros](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134536)
145+
* [Specify the behavior of `file!`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134442)
146+
* [Document representation of `Option<unsafe fn()>`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141447)
147+
* [Stabilize `feature(generic_arg_infer)`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141610)
148+
* [Allow `#![doc(test(attr(..)))]` everywhere](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140560)
149+
* [Tracking Issue for File lock API](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130994)
150+
* [disposition: unspecified] [Tracking Issue for `unsigned_signed_diff`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126041)
151+
* [Stabilise `os_string_pathbuf_leak`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137992)
152+
153+
##### [Rust RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period)
154+
* [[RFC] Add `#[export_ordinal(n)]` attribute](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3641)
155+
156+
*No Items entered Final Comment Period this week for
157+
[Cargo](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc),
158+
[Language Reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc),
159+
[Language Team](https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+) or
160+
[Unsafe Code Guidelines](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc).*
161+
162+
Let us know if you would like your PRs, Tracking Issues or RFCs to be tracked as a part of this list.
173163

174164
#### [New and Updated RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls)
175-
<!-- New or updated RFCs go here, use this format: * [new|updated] [Topic](URL) -->
176-
<!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
177-
<!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
178-
<!-- * [new|updated] []() -->
165+
* [new] [de-RFC: Remove unsized_locals](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3829)
166+
* [new] [RFC: Procedural macros in same package as app](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3826)
167+
* [new] [RFC: Allow generic impls using local trait bounds](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3821)
179168

180169
## Upcoming Events
181170

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)