Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

stabilise mixed_integer_ops #98345

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

stabilise mixed_integer_ops #98345

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC commented Jun 21, 2022 •
edited by JohnTitor
Loading

Closes #87840

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 21, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @m-ou-se

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 21, 2022
@JohnTitor JohnTitor added the relnotes Marks issues that should be documented in the release notes of the next release. label Jun 21, 2022
@joshtriplett joshtriplett added needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, so needs a completed FCP to proceed. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. and removed T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 23, 2022
@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

@rfcbot merge

@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Jun 23, 2022 •
edited by BurntSushi
Loading

Team member @joshtriplett has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@rfcbot rfcbot added proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. labels Jun 23, 2022
@scottmcm scottmcm mentioned this pull request Jun 29, 2022
Open
@rfcbot rfcbot added the final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. label Jun 29, 2022
@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Jun 29, 2022

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@rfcbot rfcbot removed the proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. label Jun 29, 2022
@rfcbot rfcbot added finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. and removed final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. labels Jul 9, 2022
@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Jul 9, 2022

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed.

This will be merged soon.

@rfcbot rfcbot added the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Jul 9, 2022
@lukas-code
Copy link
Member

From #87601:

Maybe it would be interesting to also have add_signed that panics in debug and wraps in release ?

Has this been addressed yet? There doesn't seem to be much interest in that particular function tho.

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

@Dylan-DPC Could you please update the since fields? r=me with those updated.

@bors delegate+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 23, 2022

✌️ @Dylan-DPC can now approve this pull request

@est31
Copy link
Member

est31 commented Aug 27, 2022

👋 Hello, I'm writing this comment in this stabilization PR to notify you, the authors of this PR, that #100591 has been merged, which implemented a change in how features are stabilized.

Your PR has been filed before the change, so will likely require modifications in order to comply with the new rules. I recommend you to:

  1. rebase the PR onto latest master, so that uses of the placeholder are possible.
  2. replace the version numbers in the PR with the placeholder CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION. For language changes, this means the version numbers in accepted.rs (example: 4caedba). For library changes, this means the since fields (example e576a9b).

That's it! The CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION placeholder will, as part of the release process, be replaced with the version number that the PR merged for. It can be used anywhere in rust-lang/rust, not just accepted.rs and the since fields.

If you have any questions, feel free to drop by the zulip stream, or ping me directly in this PR's thread. Thanks! 👋

@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2022
Merged
jhpratt
jhpratt reviewed Sep 8, 2022
View reviewed changes
library/core/src/num/uint_macros.rs
#[doc = concat!("assert_eq!(1", stringify!($SelfT), ".saturating_add_signed(2), 3);")]
#[doc = concat!("assert_eq!(1", stringify!($SelfT), ".saturating_add_signed(-2), 0);")]
#[doc = concat!("assert_eq!((", stringify!($SelfT), "::MAX - 2).saturating_add_signed(4), ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MAX);")]
/// ```
#[unstable(feature = "mixed_integer_ops", issue = "87840")]
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "mixed_integer_ops", issue = "87840")]
#[must_use = "this returns the result of the operation, \
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like an accidental change on this line.

@apiraino apiraino removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Sep 8, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

closing this as #101555 is being merged

@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC closed this Sep 27, 2022
@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC deleted the 87840/mixed_integer_ops-stab branch September 27, 2022 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jhpratt jhpratt jhpratt left review comments

Assignees

@m-ou-se m-ou-se

Labels
disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, so needs a completed FCP to proceed. relnotes Marks issues that should be documented in the release notes of the next release. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tracking Issue for #![feature(mixed_integer_ops)]