Rollup of 9 pull requests #83294
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #83294
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
and replace it with `extended_key_value_attributes` feature.
One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to the type of the closure _argument_.
Reuse `std::sys::unsupported::pipe` on `hermit` Pipes are not supported on `hermit` and `hermit/pipe.rs` is identical to `unsupported/pipe.rs`. This PR reduces duplication between the two by doing the following on `hermit`: ```rust #[path = "../unsupported/pipe.rs"] pub mod pipe; ```
Clarify docs for Read::read's return value Right now the docs for `Read::read`'s return value are phrased in a way that makes it easy for the reader to assume that the return value is never larger than the passed buffer. This PR clarifies that this is a requirement for implementations of the trait, but that callers have to expect a buggy yet safe implementation failing to do so, especially if unchecked accesses to the buffer are done afterwards. I fell into this trap recently, and when I noticed, I looked at the docs again and had the feeling that I might not have been the first one to miss this. The same issue of trusting the return value of `read` was also present in std itself for about 2.5 years and only fixed recently, see rust-lang#80895. I hope that clarifying the docs might help others to avoid this issue.
use checkout@v2 in CI for master Updates CI workflow to use checkout@v2 from v1 (as other parts of CI) for master, plus slightly faster checkout as result compare v2 https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/2ccf06302c08d7d4911aad40e66a9a3ee731c6f9/checks/2113902859/logs and v1 logs https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/2ccf06302c08d7d4911aad40e66a9a3ee731c6f9/checks/2115229351/logs
Fix gitattibutes for old git versions
Deprecate std::os::haiku::raw, which accidentally wasn't deprecated In early 2016, all `std::os::*::raw` modules [were deprecated](rust-lang@aa23c98) in accordance with [RFC 1415](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1415-trim-std-os.md). However, at this same time support for Haiku was being added to libstd, landing shortly after the aforementioned commit, and due to some crossed wires a `std::os::haiku::raw` module was added and was not marked as deprecated. I have been in correspondence with the author of the Haiku patch, ``@nielx,`` who has confirmed that this was simply an oversight and that the definitions from the libc crate should be preferred instead.
Remove unnecessary `forward_inner_docs` hack and replace it with `extended_key_value_attributes` feature. This is rust-lang#79150, but for compiler/.
Upgrade memmap to memmap2 memmap is no longer maintained. memmap2 is a fork that is still maintained. https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2020-0077.html The remaining use of memmap is through measureme.
Revert the second deprecation of collections::Bound Per the review at rust-lang#82122 (comment) and the decision at https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/unavoidable.20breakage.20when.20deprecating.20an.20enum.3F , revert this small portion of rust-lang#82122 for the time being. This doesn't affect the other components of that patch, i.e. `intrinsics::drop_in_place` is still deprecated-for-real, and uses of `collections::Bound` remain removed from the repo.
…_doc, r=joshtriplett Fix typo/inaccuracy in the documentation of Iterator::skip_while One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to the type of the closure _argument_. This PR just changes a single word in documentation. ```@rustbot``` modify labels: A-iterators, T-doc, T-lang
|
@bors r+ p=9 rollup=never |
|
📌 Commit 6f38617 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit 6f38617 with merge 75cc53e95d12718930cfe4a8601420a38b47bbcd... |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
std::sys::unsupported::pipeonhermit#82500 (Reusestd::sys::unsupported::pipeonhermit)forward_inner_docshack #83230 (Remove unnecessaryforward_inner_docshack)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup