(rustdoc) fix test for trait impl display #78727
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2020
|
Thanks! @bors: r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 251f6da has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
jyn514
added
A-testsuite
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2020
…eGomez (rustdoc) fix test for trait impl display The test checks that parameters and return values with `impl Trait` types are correctly generated in rustdoc's output. In essence, the previous version of the test checked the absence of values that would never be generated by rustdoc, so it could basically never fail. These values were adjusted to the expected output and are now required to exist in rustdoc's output. See rust-lang#55201 (comment) for a detailed explanation of the reasoning behind the changes. Note that the output of rustdoc for `impl Trait`s in parameters and return values did not change since the inital test creation, so this PR only modifies the test. Closes rust-lang#55201
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2020
…eGomez (rustdoc) fix test for trait impl display The test checks that parameters and return values with `impl Trait` types are correctly generated in rustdoc's output. In essence, the previous version of the test checked the absence of values that would never be generated by rustdoc, so it could basically never fail. These values were adjusted to the expected output and are now required to exist in rustdoc's output. See rust-lang#55201 (comment) for a detailed explanation of the reasoning behind the changes. Note that the output of rustdoc for `impl Trait`s in parameters and return values did not change since the inital test creation, so this PR only modifies the test. Closes rust-lang#55201
m-ou-se
added a commit
to m-ou-se/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2020
…eGomez (rustdoc) fix test for trait impl display The test checks that parameters and return values with `impl Trait` types are correctly generated in rustdoc's output. In essence, the previous version of the test checked the absence of values that would never be generated by rustdoc, so it could basically never fail. These values were adjusted to the expected output and are now required to exist in rustdoc's output. See rust-lang#55201 (comment) for a detailed explanation of the reasoning behind the changes. Note that the output of rustdoc for `impl Trait`s in parameters and return values did not change since the inital test creation, so this PR only modifies the test. Closes rust-lang#55201
This was referenced Nov 5, 2020
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2020
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#76718 (Move Vec UI tests to unit tests when possible) - rust-lang#78093 (Clean up docs for 'as' keyword) - rust-lang#78425 (Move f64::NAN ui tests into `library`) - rust-lang#78465 (Change as_str → to_string in proc_macro::Ident::span() docs) - rust-lang#78584 (Add keyboard handling to the theme picker menu) - rust-lang#78716 (Array trait impl comment/doc fixes) - rust-lang#78727 ((rustdoc) fix test for trait impl display) - rust-lang#78733 (fix a couple of clippy warnings:) - rust-lang#78735 (Simplify the implementation of `get_mut` (no unsafe)) - rust-lang#78738 (Move range in ui test to ops test in library/core) - rust-lang#78739 (Fix ICE on type error in async function) - rust-lang#78742 (make intern_const_alloc_recursive return error) - rust-lang#78756 (Update cargo) - rust-lang#78757 (Improve and clean up some intra-doc links) - rust-lang#78758 (Fixed typo in comment) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The test checks that parameters and return values with
impl Traittypes are correctly generated in rustdoc's output.In essence, the previous version of the test checked the absence of values that would never be generated by rustdoc, so it could basically never fail. These values were adjusted to the expected output and are now required to exist in rustdoc's output. See #55201 (comment) for a detailed explanation of the reasoning behind the changes.
Note that the output of rustdoc for
impl Traits in parameters and return values did not change since the inital test creation, so this PR only modifies the test.Closes #55201