Updated Release notes for 1.22.0 #45454
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,3 +1,71 @@ | ||
| Version 1.22.0 (2017-11-23) | ||
| ========================== | ||
|
|
||
| Language | ||
| -------- | ||
| - [`non_snake_case` lint now allows extern no-mangle functions][44966] | ||
| - [Now accepts underscores in unicode escapes][43716] | ||
| - [`#![feature(const_fn)]` is now no longer required for | ||
| calling const functions.][43017] It's still required for creating | ||
| constant functions. | ||
|
|
||
| Compiler | ||
| -------- | ||
| - [rustc now defaults to having 16 codegen units at debug on supported platforms.][45064] | ||
| - [rustc will no longer inline in codegen units when compiling for debug][45075] | ||
| This should decrease compile times for debug builds. | ||
| - [strict memory alignment now enabled on ARMv6][45094] | ||
| - [Remove support for the PNaCl target `le32-unknown-nacl`][45041] | ||
|
|
||
| Libraries | ||
| --------- | ||
| - [Allow atomic operations up to 32 bits | ||
| on `armv5te_unknown_linux_gnueabi`][44978] | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. GitHub isn't rendering this link -- perhaps it can't be multiline? There was a problem hiding this comment. I can't replicate this. It's a working link for me. Are you getting still getting this? |
||
| - [`Box<Error>` now impls `From<Cow<str>>`][44466] | ||
| - [`std::mem::Discriminant` is now guaranteed to be `Send + Sync`][45095] | ||
| - [`fs::copy` now returns the length of the main stream on NTFS.][44895] | ||
| - [Properly detect overflow in `Instant += Duration`.][44220] | ||
| - [impl `Hasher` for `{&mut Hasher, Box<Hasher>}`][44015] | ||
| - [impl `fmt::Debug` for `SplitWhitespace`.][44303] | ||
|
|
||
| Stabilized APIs | ||
| --------------- | ||
|
|
||
| Cargo | ||
| ----- | ||
| - [Cargo will now build multi file examples in subdirectories of the `examples` | ||
| folder that have a `main.rs` file.][cargo/4496] | ||
| - [Changed `[root]` to `[package]` in `Cargo.lock`][cargo/4571] Packages with | ||
| the old format will continue to work and can be updated with `cargo update`. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Don't forget rust-lang/cargo#3992 which is IMO the most important addition to cargo in the current release. There was a problem hiding this comment. (the entry has been added since but github doesn't show that) |
||
| - [Now supports vendoring git repositories][cargo/3992] | ||
|
|
||
| Misc | ||
| ---- | ||
| - [`libbacktrace` is now available on Apple platforms.][44251] | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Never mind, a fix without reverting was found. |
||
| - [Stabilised the `compile_fail` attribute for code fences.][43949] This now | ||
| lets you specify that a given code example will fail to compile. | ||
|
|
||
| [45075]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45075 | ||
| [45094]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45094 | ||
| [45095]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45095 | ||
| [45064]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45064 | ||
| [44895]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44895 | ||
| [44966]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44966 | ||
| [44978]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44978 | ||
| [45041]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45041 | ||
| [44466]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44466 | ||
| [44220]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44220 | ||
| [44251]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44251 | ||
| [44303]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44303 | ||
| [43949]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/43949 | ||
| [44015]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44015 | ||
| [43716]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/43716 | ||
| [43017]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/43017 | ||
| [cargo/3992]: https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/3992 | ||
| [cargo/4496]: https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/4496 | ||
| [cargo/4571]: https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/4571 | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Version 1.21.0 (2017-10-12) | ||
| ========================== | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Individual const functions are still unstable one by one — is there any of them that are stable in Rust 1.22?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think
mem::size_of?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would be amazing, but const size_of is not stabilized in current nighly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @durka Do you know any?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are none so far. We only put the infrastructure in place for doing them individually. I thought size_of was imminent though, what happened?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Aaronepower Can we remove this line about const functions? Since it has no user-visible effect in Rust 1.22
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bluss Well shouldn't it still be included since this is when it was stabilised?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's misleading about the current bullet point is you still need a feature gate for calling const fns, just a different one (in fact a different one per fn now). So you can't do anything on stable that you couldn't before.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with durka here, it's nothing user-visible (unfortunately) for the Rust 1.22.0 release.