Inline functions Ordering::{then, then_with} #40514
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@jongiddy noticed bad performance due to the lack of inlining on `then` and `then_with`. I confirmed that inlining really is the culprit by creating a custom `then` function and repeating his benchmark on my machine with and without the `#[inline]` attribute. The numbers were exactly the same on my machine without the attribute. With `#[inline]` I got the same performance as I did with manually inlined implementation.
|
r? @aturon (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
@bors: r+ |
|
📌 Commit 8af3013 has been approved by |
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2017
…excrichton
Inline functions Ordering::{then, then_with}
@jongiddy noticed bad performance due to the lack of inlining on `then`
and `then_with`. I confirmed that inlining really is the culprit by
creating a custom `then` function and repeating his benchmark on my
machine with and without the `#[inline]` attribute.
The numbers were exactly the same on my machine without the attribute.
With `#[inline]` I got the same performance as I did with manually
inlined implementation.
The problem was reported in rust-lang#37053.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2017
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2017
frewsxcv
added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2017
…excrichton
Inline functions Ordering::{then, then_with}
@jongiddy noticed bad performance due to the lack of inlining on `then`
and `then_with`. I confirmed that inlining really is the culprit by
creating a custom `then` function and repeating his benchmark on my
machine with and without the `#[inline]` attribute.
The numbers were exactly the same on my machine without the attribute.
With `#[inline]` I got the same performance as I did with manually
inlined implementation.
The problem was reported in rust-lang#37053.
ghost
deleted the
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@jongiddy noticed bad performance due to the lack of inlining on
thenand
then_with. I confirmed that inlining really is the culprit bycreating a custom
thenfunction and repeating his benchmark on mymachine with and without the
#[inline]attribute.The numbers were exactly the same on my machine without the attribute.
With
#[inline]I got the same performance as I did with manuallyinlined implementation.
The problem was reported in #37053.